Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 7

Statute: Specific Relief Act, 1963 (specific-relief-act-1963)

Upendra Kumar v. Ashok Rai

undefined INSC 837Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

दी द एव फ दी स वा बितू त क क स वा स्थि ब वववा ब दत जमदी न पर हलो रह क ब नमर्मा ण कवा यर्य कवा फ लोटलो ग्रवा फ दवा ब खिल ब कयवा गयवा और ब नव क दन ब कयवा गयवा ब क मददवा लहन मदकदमवा कदी जवा नकवा रदी क क Patna High Court C.Misc. No.57 of 2024 dt.02-02-2024 3/4 बिवावजतू न्यवा यवा लय नहदी आकर ब वववा ब...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Archana Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 193Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

(Sc16) Mr.Madhukar Mishra (AC to SC 16) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 25-06-2024 Re:- I.A. No.1 of 2020 The present I.A. No.01/2020 has been filed on behalf of the petitioner to add the additional relief...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

the Bihar State Tourism Development Corporation (Annexure-5). Thereafter, an agreement was entered into between the parties on 29 th August, 2013. The consideration money was fixed as Rs.17.37 crores, Patna High Court C.R. No.12 of 2021(11) dt.12-01-2024 3/10 as per Clause 5 of the agreement. The ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Archana Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 775Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1412 of 2020 ====================================================== Archana Kumari Wife of Sri Pawan Kumar Singh, Resident of Village- Jagdishpur, P.O. and P.S.- Jagdishpur, District- West Champaran at Bettiah. ... ... Petiti...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 343Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.426 of 2022 ====================================================== Jyoti Kumari W/o Ajeet Kumar Aryan R/v- Paharpur, Ward No- 9, Gram Panchayat Alampur Kodaria, P.S.- Bibhutipur, Dist- Samastipur. ... ... ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Amesh Nandan Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 127Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.627 of 2022 ====================================================== Amesh Nandan Prasad Son of Late Deoki Nandan Prasad Resident of Village and P.S.- Daniawan, Dist.- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1.The State of Bihar Thr...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Nisha Bharti v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 212Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2438 of 2024 ====================================================== Nisha Bharti Wife of Nagendra Sharma, resident of Village-Naya Tola, Bhalui, P.S.-Chanan, District-Lakhisarai. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1.The State of Bih...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Harendra Prasad Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 351Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2247 of 2024 ====================================================== Harendra Prasad Yadav S/o Ramavatar Ray Resident of Village Chitariya tola Jasauli Patti Kotwa P.S. Kotwa district- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s Versu...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.3 of 2022 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10685 of 2019 ====================================================== Vinni Kumari presently residing at Bhawar Pokhar, Behind Khetan Market, P.S. - Pirbahore, district- Patna, Posted as Dre...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Dipak Kumar Jha v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 168Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

Mr. Sajid Salim Khan, Advocate Mr. W.A. Khan, AC to SC-25 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 426-02-2024 Heard the parties. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the following reliefs: (i) for issuance...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 3Next Page →