Cases Citing Section 33
Statute: Specific Relief Act, 1963 (specific-relief-act-1963)
undefined INSC 414 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
Mr. Sajid Salim Khan, Advocate Mr. W.A. Khan, AC to SC-25 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 426-02-2024 Heard the parties. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the following reliefs: (i) for issuance...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 831 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1781 of 2024 ====================================================== Rahul Kumar Son of Mahesh Thakur Resident of Bhabhaul Chak Dihri Police Station Pipra Punpun District Patna at Present Resident of Village Gandhihat, Police Dt...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 890 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
come under the purview of superstructure, as mentioned in Section 2(k) of the Act, 2008. 12. The Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of M/s Brahmaputra Infrastructure Ltd. (supra), after referring Sections 8, 9 and 22 of the Act 2008 has held in paragraph-5 of the said...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →1973 4 SCC 225 • Supreme Court of India
FACTS: Challenged Kerala Land Reforms Act. 13-judge bench reviewed parliament's power to amend the Constitution. Held: Parliament can amend any part of the Constitution, including Fundamental Rights, but cannot alter or destroy the 'Basic Structure' of the Constitution. Ratio: Basic Structure doctri...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 166 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
W/o Purushottam Das presently residing at - C/o Sitabji, Dariyapur, Mohar Tola, P.S.- Kadamkuan, District- Patna, presently posted as Dresser in Female O.T. (Gayni) Patna Medical College and Hospital, Patna High Court L.P.A No.3 of 2022(4) dt.16-01-2024 2/3 Patna. 13.Madhaw Murari Singh S/o Baban ...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →1978 1 SCC 248 • Supreme Court of India
FACTS: Petitioner's passport was impounded without giving reasons. Held: Article 21 procedure must be 'just, fair, and reasonable', not arbitrary or oppressive. Ratio: Expanded Article 21 scope, introducing substantive due process principles into Indian jurisprudence....
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 361 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3918 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-375 Year-2023 Thana- RIGA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== 1.Sanjay Kumar Yadav Son of Rambali Rai R/o vill - Sakraul, ward no. 7, P.S. - Simra, Distt...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →2014 8 SCC 273 • Supreme Court of India
FACTS: Anticipatory bail application in a Section 498A IPC cruelty case. Held: Arrest should not be the default action in offences carrying punishment of less than 7 years. Ratio: Police must comply with Section 41A CrPC (now Section 35 BNSS) notice guidelines before executing arrest....
Read Full Judgment Analysis →2013 2 SCC 1 • Supreme Court of India
FACTS: Petition seeking action for police failure to register an FIR for kidnapping. Held: Registration of FIR is mandatory under Section 154 CrPC (now Section 173 BNSS) if the information discloses a cognizable offence. Ratio: No preliminary inquiry is permitted if cognizable offence is disclosed; ...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 160 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3882 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-19 Year-2023 Thana- SC/ST District- Banka ====================================================== Nunmani Yadav @ Nunumani Yadav @ Mani Lal Yadav S/O Bindeshwari Yadav R/O Village- Mahmadpur, ...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →