Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 26

Statute: Specific Relief Act, 1963 (specific-relief-act-1963)

Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 183Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

question of fact with regard the date of the marriage of the petitioner, which otherwise also, can not be determined without taking evidences. 9. So far the post of Aganwadi Sevika is concerned, it is a post created under the scheme and not holding any civil post, thus no prot...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Yogendra Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 769Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.5 of 2023 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6732 of 2017 ====================================================== Yogendra Prasad son of late Rameshwar Prasad Singh, resident of Village Makhdumpur, Police Station- Ekangarsara...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Archana Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 747Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

joined on the post of Panchayat Teacher in the year 2007 in Primary School, Jagdishpur, Block-Nautan, District-West Champaran at Bettiah. 4.He further submits that the petitioner had executed the Patna High Court CWJC No.1412 of 2020 dt.25-06-2024 3/4 works continuously, sincerely and to the satis...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Harendra Prasad Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 208Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2247 of 2024 ====================================================== Harendra Prasad Yadav S/o Ramavatar Ray Resident of Village Chitariya tola Jasauli Patti Kotwa P.S. Kotwa district- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s Versu...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Archana Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 776Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

authorities shall take action against the petitioner in accordance with law. 6.A counter affidavit is filed on behalf of the State in which he has stated that any degree of Tribhuwan University, Nepal has been declared ‘not valid’ for appointment of regular/Niyojit teachers. All niyojan units were ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Archana Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 216Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

(Sc16) Mr.Madhukar Mishra (AC to SC 16) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 25-06-2024 Re:- I.A. No.1 of 2020 The present I.A. No.01/2020 has been filed on behalf of the petitioner to add the additional relief...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

Pramod Sah presently residing at C/o Bachchu Rajak, Mohalla- Mahendru, Near Malariya Office, P.S.- Sultanganj, District- Patna, presently posted as Dresser in the Department of Surgical I.C.U. Patna Medical College and Hospital, Patna. 12.Pushpa Rani W/o Purushottam Das presently residing at - C/o ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.3 of 2022 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10685 of 2019 ====================================================== Vinni Kumari presently residing at Bhawar Pokhar, Behind Khetan Market, P.S. - Pirbahore, district- Patna, Posted as Dre...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

which was to be based on a platform of 30 ft height. As such, the work performed by the petitioner in pursuance of the contract comes under the definition of ‘work contract’ defined in Section 2(k) of the Act 2008. Therefore, the Arbitration Tribunal has jurisdiction over the disput...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

a sand stone statue of Lord Budha having 70 ft height in Bhumi Sparsh posture, on the platform of a height of 30 ft. The learned counsel submitted that as per the Agreement, 30 ft high platform was to be constructed first and thereon the statue of Lord Budha was to be installed. As such, ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 3Next Page →