Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 22

Statute: Specific Relief Act, 1963 (specific-relief-act-1963)

Kaushal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 526Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

by which the petitioner has been dismissed from the service and further to reinstate him in service with all consequential benefits. 3.Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the final Patna High Court CWJC No.2681 of 2019 dt.12-02-2024 2/3 order of punishment has been passed by the order ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Archana Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 489Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1412 of 2020 ====================================================== Archana Kumari Wife of Sri Pawan Kumar Singh, Resident of Village- Jagdishpur, P.O. and P.S.- Jagdishpur, District- West Champaran at Bettiah. ... ... Petiti...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Manoj Kumar v. Mr. Amir Subhani, The Chief Secretary, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

undefined INSC 658Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.125 of 2024 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2484 of 2020 ====================================================== Manoj Kumar, Son of Late Jagdish Rai, Resident of Dharmi Raman Kutir, D.V.C. Road, Yarpur, P.S.- Gardanibagh,...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sahabuddin Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 116Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1759 of 2024 ====================================================== Sahabuddin Ansari @ Shahabuddin Ansari Son of Yakuf Ansari, Resident of Dalpatpur, Police Station- Maharajganj, District- Siwan. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Kunal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 306Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

connection with Shahpur P.S. Case No. 281 of 2023 subject to the following conditions: (i) one of the bailor should be the family member of the petitioner who shall provide official document to show Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4429 of 2024(2) dt.05-02-2024 3/3 his/her bona fide; (ii) the petitio...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sheo Charan Dalmia v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 157Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

P.N. Shahi, Sr. Advocate Mr.Avinash Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s: Mr. Abbas Haider, SC-6 Mr. Wasi Mohammad, AC to SC-6 For the Corporation : Mr. Rabindra Kumar Priyadarshi, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Santosh Kumar Sahu v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 322Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6504 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-290 Year-2023 Thana- BAHERI District- Darbhanga ====================================================== 1.Santosh Kumar Sahu @ Santosh Sahu Son of Bilat Sahu @ Bilat Sah R/o vill - Barmattar, P...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sheo Charan Dalmia v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 197Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

no. 38 (Old), Holding no. 96 (subsequent), presently part of Holding no. 1; (ii) further for direction to the respondents particularly respondent no. 3, 4 & 7 to abstain from creating unnecessary and unreasonable restrictions upon the petitioners in exercising their right to...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

a sand stone statue of Lord Budha having 70 ft height in Bhumi Sparsh posture, on the platform of a height of 30 ft. The learned counsel submitted that as per the Agreement, 30 ft high platform was to be constructed first and thereon the statue of Lord Budha was to be installed. As such, ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Usha Devi v. The State Of Bihar Bihar

undefined INSC 701Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

P.S. Case No. 48 of 2023 registered for the offence under Section 366A, 376, 372/34 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 4 of the POCSO Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioners are the aunt of victim girl and it appears that the due to some monetary dispute this case has been regi...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 4Next Page →