Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 65

Statute: Sale of Goods Act, 1930 (sale-of-goods-act-1930)

KS Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017) 10 SCC 1

2017 10 SCC 1Supreme Court of India

69% Match

FACTS: Challenged Aadhaar biometrics scheme as violating privacy. Held: Right to Privacy is a fundamental right guaranteed under Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution of India. Ratio: Privacy is intrinsic to life and personal liberty, subject to proportionality tests for state restrictions....

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Rajesh Tewari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 219Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

litigation. Despite these factual aspects, the concerned authority proceeded to re-auction the subject matter of vehicle and created third party right on 25.01.2023 and it was auctioned for the Patna High Court CWJC No.1022 of 2021 dt.09-12-2024 4/12 second time at Rs. 6,05,500/-. The second aucti...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

08.10.2013 as well as for payment of 5% of total amount, which was to be paid at the juncture of approval of clay model submitted by the petitioner, as per clause 5(ii) of the Agreement. The said writ application was dismissed and the petitioner then filed LPA No. 494 of 2014, which was disposed of...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Manohar Lal v. State

undefined INSC 214Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

based on the fact that he is owner of the Truck. It is next submitted that petitioner is a businessman and no prudent businessman would use his own vehicle for committing an occurrence and thus would Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7339 of 2024(2) dt.22-02-2024 2/2 create evidence against hims...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Rajesh Tewari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 457Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

was cancelled and vehicle was recovered from the 7 th respondent and it was handed over to the jurisdiction police. Such handing over the vehicle was subject to outcome of a present litigation. Despite these factual aspects, the concerned authority proceeded to re-auction the subject matter of vehi...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Md. Nakib Alam v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 503Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

Bakhtiyarpur (Baluahat O.P) P.S Case No. 29 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 120(B), 506/34 of the I.P.C. 3. As per prosecution case, there is allegation that as per direction of Government, the informant, who is PACS Mangager, made agreement on 10.06.2015 wit...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

the letter sent by him is still with the Managing Director, Bihar State Tourism Development Corporation, who is Arbitrator, as per paragraph- 22 of the Agreement, which is extracted hereinbelow:- “22. In case of any difference of opinion in any item of work the issue will be resolved by the Man...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Niwas Raut v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 875Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

13.11.1994 at 04.00 PM while informant's brother Anurudh Singh, his neighbours Shashi Bhushan Singh and Rajendra Singh went to cut Marhin of paddy crop and when the informant arrived there he saw that wife of Dashrath Raut plucking Gram Sag from his field and thereafter aforesaid three persons went...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sanjay Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 816Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

of the petitioners. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submits that nothing incriminating Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3918 of 2024(2) dt.30-01-2024 2/3 article has been recovered from t...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Virendra Mukhiya v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 195Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

17.520 liters of Nepali Saufi wine has been recovered from the house of petitioner. 4. It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that alleged recovery has been effected from the house, which is in joint possession of the family members. Petitioner lives out of Bihar for his livelihood and he has got ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 4Next Page →