Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 41

Statute: Sale of Goods Act, 1930 (sale-of-goods-act-1930)

Upendra Kumar v. Ashok Rai

undefined INSC 551Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

दी द एव फ दी स वा बितू त क क स वा स्थि ब वववा ब दत जमदी न पर हलो रह क ब नमर्मा ण कवा यर्य कवा फ लोटलो ग्रवा फ दवा ब खिल ब कयवा गयवा और ब नव क दन ब कयवा गयवा ब क मददवा लहन मदकदमवा कदी जवा नकवा रदी क क Patna High Court C.Misc. No.57 of 2024 dt.02-02-2024 3/4 बिवावजतू न्यवा यवा लय नहदी आकर ब वववा ब...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Kumar Pushpak v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 566Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4141 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-765 Year-2023 Thana- PATRAKARNAGAR District- Patna ====================================================== Kumar Pushpak S/O Late Parmeshwer Prasad R/O Villag- Ruidhasa, Kali Mandir, P.S And Di...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sita Ram Singh v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 148Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

Sita Ram Yadav ( GP-16 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIBEK CHAUDHURI ORAL ORDER 410-09-2024The petitioners was a daily wage employee in Minor Irrigation Department in the District of Katihar. His service was terminated by an order dated 09.03...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Manohar Lal v. State

undefined INSC 614Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

Biharsharif, Nalanda, where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Excise P.S. Case No. 766 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. aditi/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Rajesh Tewari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 862Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

is knowingly or unknowingly, there is inaction on the part of the superiors against such erring officials despite our earlier orders in not following or adhering to the relevant rules and procedures. Patna High Court CWJC No.1022 of 2021 dt.09-12-2024 6/12 In the present case, in not recording the...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

the letter sent by him is still with the Managing Director, Bihar State Tourism Development Corporation, who is Arbitrator, as per paragraph- 22 of the Agreement, which is extracted hereinbelow:- “22. In case of any difference of opinion in any item of work the issue will be resolved by the Man...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Ritu Priya v. Abhishek Kumar Singh

undefined INSC 481Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI) 418-12-2024In terms of the previous order dated 20.11.2024, the present Miscellaneous Appeal No. 2 of 2023 stands dismissed for non-compliance. manish/- (P. B. Bajanthri, J) ( Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) U...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Rajesh Tewari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 557Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

got his vehicle insured on 05.02.2020 for about Rs.14 lacs with reference to the vehicle was 7 years old read with the fact that vehicle value as on the date of its purchase on 16.12.2013 would Patna High Court CWJC No.1022 of 2021 dt.09-12-2024 10/12 be around Rs.21,99,000/- Similarly, first auct...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sangita Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 316Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1113 of 2020 ====================================================== Sangita Mandal Wife of Lakshman Mandal Resident of Nirsa Nagar, P.S. and District- Hatiya (Jharkhand) at present residing in the house of Gopal Kumar, 3LF/4/27...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
KS Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017) 10 SCC 1

2017 10 SCC 1Supreme Court of India

68% Match

FACTS: Challenged Aadhaar biometrics scheme as violating privacy. Held: Right to Privacy is a fundamental right guaranteed under Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution of India. Ratio: Privacy is intrinsic to life and personal liberty, subject to proportionality tests for state restrictions....

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 4Next Page →