Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 38

Statute: Sale of Goods Act, 1930 (sale-of-goods-act-1930)

a sand stone statue of Lord Budha having 70 ft height in Bhumi Sparsh posture, on the platform of a height of 30 ft. The learned counsel submitted that as per the Agreement, 30 ft high platform was to be constructed first and thereon the statue of Lord Budha was to be installed. As such, ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

the Bihar State Tourism Development Corporation (Annexure-5). Thereafter, an agreement was entered into between the parties on 29 th August, 2013. The consideration money was fixed as Rs.17.37 crores, Patna High Court C.R. No.12 of 2021(11) dt.12-01-2024 3/10 as per Clause 5 of the agreement. The ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sheo Charan Dalmia v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 344Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

no. 38 (Old), Holding no. 96 (subsequent), presently part of Holding no. 1; (ii) further for direction to the respondents particularly respondent no. 3, 4 & 7 to abstain from creating unnecessary and unreasonable restrictions upon the petitioners in exercising their right to...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

which was to be based on a platform of 30 ft height. As such, the work performed by the petitioner in pursuance of the contract comes under the definition of ‘work contract’ defined in Section 2(k) of the Act 2008. Therefore, the Arbitration Tribunal has jurisdiction over the disput...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Harendra Prasad Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 362Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

petitioner. Therefore, the same has to held as bad, illegal, contrary to the provisions of Rule 27(ii) of the Control Order and has to necessarily set aside. 9. Having regard to the above facts and circumstances and the law laid down by this Hon’ble...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Rajesh Tewari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 114Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

at a particular figure in respect of petitioner and first auction purchaser. Petitioner is concerned with the Insurance Policy dated 05.02.2020 that was in vogue till 04.02.2021 and it was insured Patna High Court CWJC No.1022 of 2021 dt.09-12-2024 8/12 for Rs.14 lacs read with the date of seizure...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

the letter sent by him is still with the Managing Director, Bihar State Tourism Development Corporation, who is Arbitrator, as per paragraph- 22 of the Agreement, which is extracted hereinbelow:- “22. In case of any difference of opinion in any item of work the issue will be resolved by the Man...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

in holding that it has no jurisdiction to decide the matter. Undisputedly, the authority mentioned in paragraph-22 of the Agreement has only jurisdiction over the subject matter of the contract. 14. The revision application is accordingly dismissed. 15. As it has already been submitted that the ma...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Rajesh Tewari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 231Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

that in the present case, prima facie, petitioner as well as 1 st auction purchaser have made out a case that they are tentatively entitled to a sum of Rs.14 lakhs plus interest on behalf of the petitioner and first auction purchaser @ Rs. 7,89,700/-. If these amounts are required to be determined ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Rajesh Tewari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 198Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

dated 19 th December, 2020 by which the Tank Lorry bearing registration number NL01L0911 has been advertised to be sold through public auction on 19.01.2021; (iii) Issuance of writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to forthwith release Tank Lorry bearing registration number NL01L0911, since it...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 3Next Page →