Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 35

Statute: Sale of Goods Act, 1930 (sale-of-goods-act-1930)

which was to be based on a platform of 30 ft height. As such, the work performed by the petitioner in pursuance of the contract comes under the definition of ‘work contract’ defined in Section 2(k) of the Act 2008. Therefore, the Arbitration Tribunal has jurisdiction over the disput...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

the letter sent by him is still with the Managing Director, Bihar State Tourism Development Corporation, who is Arbitrator, as per paragraph- 22 of the Agreement, which is extracted hereinbelow:- “22. In case of any difference of opinion in any item of work the issue will be resolved by the Man...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Rajesh Tewari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 414Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

is knowingly or unknowingly, there is inaction on the part of the superiors against such erring officials despite our earlier orders in not following or adhering to the relevant rules and procedures. Patna High Court CWJC No.1022 of 2021 dt.09-12-2024 6/12 In the present case, in not recording the...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

in holding that it has no jurisdiction to decide the matter. Undisputedly, the authority mentioned in paragraph-22 of the Agreement has only jurisdiction over the subject matter of the contract. 14. The revision application is accordingly dismissed. 15. As it has already been submitted that the ma...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

of Prasad Bhawan, East Ram Krishna Nagar, Patna, presently posted as Dresser in O.T.- 1, Patna Medical College and Hospital, Patna. 18.Putul Kumari D/o Ramadhar Manjhi resident of Telpa House, Bhawar Pokhar, Vijay Gopal Banarge Path, P.S.- Pirbahore, District- Patna, presently posted as Dresser in ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
The Union Of India v. Lalan Kumar

undefined INSC 877Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.789 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.22349 of 2012 ====================================================== 1.The Union Of India through Secretary Cum D.G., department of Post, Bhawan, New Delhi. 2.The Assistant Dire...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Rajesh Tewari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 796Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

Kishore Thakur, Advocate. For the State: Mr. AG. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY Patna High Court CWJC No.1022 of 2021 dt.09-12-2024 2/12 ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Upendra Kumar v. Ashok Rai

undefined INSC 253Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

दी द एव फ दी स वा बितू त क क स वा स्थि ब वववा ब दत जमदी न पर हलो रह क ब नमर्मा ण कवा यर्य कवा फ लोटलो ग्रवा फ दवा ब खिल ब कयवा गयवा और ब नव क दन ब कयवा गयवा ब क मददवा लहन मदकदमवा कदी जवा नकवा रदी क क Patna High Court C.Misc. No.57 of 2024 dt.02-02-2024 3/4 बिवावजतू न्यवा यवा लय नहदी आकर ब वववा ब...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
KS Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017) 10 SCC 1

2017 10 SCC 1Supreme Court of India

68% Match

FACTS: Challenged Aadhaar biometrics scheme as violating privacy. Held: Right to Privacy is a fundamental right guaranteed under Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution of India. Ratio: Privacy is intrinsic to life and personal liberty, subject to proportionality tests for state restrictions....

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Manohar Lal v. State

undefined INSC 696Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of one case and allegation is of recovery of 277 liter of liquor from a Truck. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not arrested from t...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 4Next Page →