Cases Citing Section 28
Statute: Sale of Goods Act, 1930 (sale-of-goods-act-1930)
undefined INSC 286 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
दी द एव फ दी स वा बितू त क क स वा स्थि ब वववा ब दत जमदी न पर हलो रह क ब नमर्मा ण कवा यर्य कवा फ लोटलो ग्रवा फ दवा ब खिल ब कयवा गयवा और ब नव क दन ब कयवा गयवा ब क मददवा लहन मदकदमवा कदी जवा नकवा रदी क क Patna High Court C.Misc. No.57 of 2024 dt.02-02-2024 3/4 बिवावजतू न्यवा यवा लय नहदी आकर ब वववा ब...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 728 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
P.S.- Alamganj, District- Patna, presently posted as Dresser in R.S.B. O.T. No. 5, Patna Medical College and Hospital, Patna. 23.Chandan Kumar S/o Sudama Singh resident of Village- Karma, Post- Karma, Via- Nasriganj, P.S.- Karakat (Gorari), District- Rohtas, presently posted as Dresser in R.S.B. O....
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 849 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2247 of 2024 ====================================================== Harendra Prasad Yadav S/o Ramavatar Ray Resident of Village Chitariya tola Jasauli Patti Kotwa P.S. Kotwa district- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s Versu...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 232 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of one case and allegation is of recovery of 277 liter of liquor from a Truck. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not arrested from t...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 636 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
17.520 liters of Nepali Saufi wine has been recovered from the house of petitioner. 4. It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that alleged recovery has been effected from the house, which is in joint possession of the family members. Petitioner lives out of Bihar for his livelihood and he has got ...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 483 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.789 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.22349 of 2012 ====================================================== 1.The Union Of India through Secretary Cum D.G., department of Post, Bhawan, New Delhi. 2.The Assistant Dire...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 124 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
which was to be based on a platform of 30 ft height. As such, the work performed by the petitioner in pursuance of the contract comes under the definition of ‘work contract’ defined in Section 2(k) of the Act 2008. Therefore, the Arbitration Tribunal has jurisdiction over the disput...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 697 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
for the petitioner submits that now after compliance of order of this court, the present petition has become infructuous. 3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. alok/- (Alok Kumar Pandey, J) U T...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 772 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
of Prasad Bhawan, East Ram Krishna Nagar, Patna, presently posted as Dresser in O.T.- 1, Patna Medical College and Hospital, Patna. 18.Putul Kumari D/o Ramadhar Manjhi resident of Telpa House, Bhawar Pokhar, Vijay Gopal Banarge Path, P.S.- Pirbahore, District- Patna, presently posted as Dresser in ...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →2017 10 SCC 1 • Supreme Court of India
FACTS: Challenged Aadhaar biometrics scheme as violating privacy. Held: Right to Privacy is a fundamental right guaranteed under Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution of India. Ratio: Privacy is intrinsic to life and personal liberty, subject to proportionality tests for state restrictions....
Read Full Judgment Analysis →