Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 81A

Statute: Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (negotiable-instruments-act-1881)

be referred to as ‘the Arbitration Tribunal’), in Reference Case No. 70/2016, by which the Arbitration Tribunal dismissed the reference made under Sections 9 and 11 of the Bihar Public Works Contracts Patna High Court C.R. No.12 of 2021(11) dt.12-01-2024 2/10 Disputes Arbitration Tribunal Ac...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Gajendra Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 389Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

67% Match

1408, 14th Floor, D.B. Ozone Beside Thakur Mall, Near Dahisar Check Naka, Mira Road, P.S. - Kashimira, East Thane Mumbai (401107) 4.Gyan Ranjan Thakur @ Anshu Thakur Son Of Gajendra Thakur Resident Of Village - Rupolia, Panchkadi, P.S. - Dhaka, District - Motihari, At Present Flat No .- 1408, 14th ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Yogendra Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 481Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

67% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.5 of 2023 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6732 of 2017 ====================================================== Yogendra Prasad son of late Rameshwar Prasad Singh, resident of Village Makhdumpur, Police Station- Ekangarsara...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) 4 SCC 225

1973 4 SCC 225Supreme Court of India

67% Match

FACTS: Challenged Kerala Land Reforms Act. 13-judge bench reviewed parliament's power to amend the Constitution. Held: Parliament can amend any part of the Constitution, including Fundamental Rights, but cannot alter or destroy the 'Basic Structure' of the Constitution. Ratio: Basic Structure doctri...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sheo Charan Dalmia v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 278Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

67% Match

(ii) further for direction to the respondents particularly respondent no. 3, 4 & 7 to abstain from creating unnecessary and unreasonable restrictions upon the petitioners in exercising their right to Patna High Court CWJC No.729 of 2024(2) dt.25-04-2024 3/5 property including right to alie...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Dipak Kumar Jha v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 450Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

67% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1507 of 2017 ====================================================== Dipak Kumar Jha Son of Late Shyam Charan Jha, Grand Son of Late Tara Charan Jha @ Lalan Babu Resident of Village - Mahisi, P.O. and P.S. - Mahisi, ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Chandradeo Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 794Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

67% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4 of 2023 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6909 of 2022 ====================================================== Chandradeo Mandal, Son of Dukhi Mandal, resident of Village- Khagor, P.S.- Kiul, District- Lakhisarai. ... ......

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Upendra Kumar v. Ashok Rai

undefined INSC 125Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

67% Match

construction over the suit property and parties were directed to maintain status quo without hearing the defendant/petitioner. No notice was issued as is reflected from the copy of the order sheet Patna High Court C.Misc. No.57 of 2024 dt.02-02-2024 2/4 attached with the present petition. ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sheo Charan Dalmia v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 192Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

67% Match

P.N. Shahi, Sr. Advocate Mr.Avinash Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s: Mr. Abbas Haider, SC-6 Mr. Wasi Mohammad, AC to SC-6 For the Corporation : Mr. Rabindra Kumar Priyadarshi, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Anil Singh v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 389Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

67% Match

P.S. and Anchal Rajauli District Nawada. And further direction be issued to the respondent concern to conclude the encroachment proceeding being Encroachment Case No.6/2020-21 to its logical end in Patna High Court CWJC No.809 of 2024(2) dt.29-04-2024 2/2 accordance with law.” 2. At the outset, t...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 4Next Page →