Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 138

Statute: Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (negotiable-instruments-act-1881)

Yogendra Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 548Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

67% Match

Bindu Bhushan, Chief Engineer, Muzaffarpur Zone, Public Health Engineering Department, Muzaffarpur. 6.Sri Manoj Kumar, Superintending Engineer, Public Health Engineering Darbhanga Circle, Darbhanga. 7.Sri Subodh Sankar, Executive Engineer, Public Health Division, Madhubani. 8.Sri Dharmendra Kumar, ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Rajesh Tewari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 476Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

67% Match

case of owner is from the Nagaland whereas auction advertised through newspaper was in State of Bihar. These things have not been taken note of for these many years in umpteen number of excise cases. However, the officials are keep on committing one or the other error whether it is knowingly or unk...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sangita Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 489Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

67% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1113 of 2020 ====================================================== Sangita Mandal Wife of Lakshman Mandal Resident of Nirsa Nagar, P.S. and District- Hatiya (Jharkhand) at present residing in the house of Gopal Kumar, 3LF/4/27...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Rajesh Tewari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 184Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

67% Match

is knowingly or unknowingly, there is inaction on the part of the superiors against such erring officials despite our earlier orders in not following or adhering to the relevant rules and procedures. Patna High Court CWJC No.1022 of 2021 dt.09-12-2024 6/12 In the present case, in not recording the...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar (2014) 8 SCC 273

2014 8 SCC 273Supreme Court of India

67% Match

FACTS: Anticipatory bail application in a Section 498A IPC cruelty case. Held: Arrest should not be the default action in offences carrying punishment of less than 7 years. Ratio: Police must comply with Section 41A CrPC (now Section 35 BNSS) notice guidelines before executing arrest....

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Baby Singh v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 462Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

67% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1393 of 2024 ====================================================== 1.Baby Singh Wife of Umesh Prasad Singh Resident of Mohalla- Mohanpur, Punaichak, Sundri Bhawan, P.S.- Shashtrinagar, Dist.- Patna. 2.Umesh Prasad Singh, ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Rajesh Tewari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 865Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

67% Match

that in the present case, prima facie, petitioner as well as 1 st auction purchaser have made out a case that they are tentatively entitled to a sum of Rs.14 lakhs plus interest on behalf of the petitioner and first auction purchaser @ Rs. 7,89,700/-. If these amounts are required to be determined ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Upendra Kumar v. Ashok Rai

undefined INSC 498Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

67% Match

construction over the suit property and parties were directed to maintain status quo without hearing the defendant/petitioner. No notice was issued as is reflected from the copy of the order sheet Patna High Court C.Misc. No.57 of 2024 dt.02-02-2024 2/4 attached with the present petition. ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

in holding that it has no jurisdiction to decide the matter. Undisputedly, the authority mentioned in paragraph-22 of the Agreement has only jurisdiction over the subject matter of the contract. 14. The revision application is accordingly dismissed. 15. As it has already been submitted that the ma...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
The Union Of India v. Lalan Kumar

undefined INSC 540Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

67% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.789 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.22349 of 2012 ====================================================== 1.The Union Of India through Secretary Cum D.G., department of Post, Bhawan, New Delhi. 2.The Assistant Dire...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 4Next Page →