Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 75

Statute: Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008 (limited-liability-partnership-act-2008)

Dipak Kumar Jha v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 211Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1507 of 2017 ====================================================== Dipak Kumar Jha Son of Late Shyam Charan Jha, Grand Son of Late Tara Charan Jha @ Lalan Babu Resident of Village - Mahisi, P.O. and P.S. - Mahisi, ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

petitioner submitted clay model of statue of Lord Budha in Bhumi Sparsh posture which was approved by the respondents, amongst other bidders. The petitioner also became successful in a financial bid and thereafter work order was issued to him, vide letter no. 487 dated 14.08.2013, issued by...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Ravi Ranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar Bihar

undefined INSC 271Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

and Excise Act, 2018. 3. As per prosecution case, there was alleged recovery of 820.800 liters foreign liquor from Mahindra Pick-up van in question. The petitioner was alleged to be driver of the said vehicle and apprehended on the spot. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petition...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

in holding that it has no jurisdiction to decide the matter. Undisputedly, the authority mentioned in paragraph-22 of the Agreement has only jurisdiction over the subject matter of the contract. 14. The revision application is accordingly dismissed. 15. As it has already been submitted that the ma...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Mukesh Kumar Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 348Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

some extent so that the petitioner can make payment of the maintenance allowance. 5. I have perused the materials on record. The opposite party in her evidence admitted in cross-examination that the Patna High Court CR. REV. No.148 of 2019 dt.24-04-2024 3/4 petitioner is a day labourer. There is o...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Manohar Lal v. State

undefined INSC 411Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of one case and allegation is of recovery of 277 liter of liquor from a Truck. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not arrested from t...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Mukesh Kumar Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 619Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL REVISION No.148 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-0 Thana- District- Munger ====================================================== Mukesh Kumar Mandal @ Mukesh Mandal, Son of Raj Kumar Mandal, Resident of Village- Lal Darwaza, P.S.- Kotwali, ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Nisha Bharti v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 345Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2438 of 2024 ====================================================== Nisha Bharti Wife of Nagendra Sharma, resident of Village-Naya Tola, Bhalui, P.S.-Chanan, District-Lakhisarai. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1.The State of Bih...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.3 of 2022 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10685 of 2019 ====================================================== Vinni Kumari presently residing at Bhawar Pokhar, Behind Khetan Market, P.S. - Pirbahore, district- Patna, Posted as Dre...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sheo Charan Dalmia v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 146Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

(ii) further for direction to the respondents particularly respondent no. 3, 4 & 7 to abstain from creating unnecessary and unreasonable restrictions upon the petitioners in exercising their right to Patna High Court CWJC No.729 of 2024(2) dt.25-04-2024 3/5 property including right to alie...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 4Next Page →