Cases Citing Section 81
Statute: Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)
2017 10 SCC 1 • Supreme Court of India
FACTS: Challenged Aadhaar biometrics scheme as violating privacy. Held: Right to Privacy is a fundamental right guaranteed under Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution of India. Ratio: Privacy is intrinsic to life and personal liberty, subject to proportionality tests for state restrictions....
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 173 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1781 of 2024 ====================================================== Rahul Kumar Son of Mahesh Thakur Resident of Bhabhaul Chak Dihri Police Station Pipra Punpun District Patna at Present Resident of Village Gandhihat, Police Dt...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 704 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
the Indian Penal Code and later on Section 304 of the Indian Penal Code was added. 3. Prosecution case, in short, is that accused persons including this petitioner armed with lathi, danda and pistol assaulted the informant. On hulla, all the accused persons fled away. ...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 626 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11542 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-264 Year-2022 Thana- FOREST (GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL) District- Jamui ====================================================== 1.Bharat Yadav Son of Ganesh Yadav R/o vill - Baijala, P.S. - Jhajha,...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 170 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
for the offence registered under sections 342, 323, 147, 149, 307, 379 of the Indian Penal Code lodged on 13.07.2023 by the informant Jampa Devi. 3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that on 09.07.2023, when the informant’s husband was going to meet Md. Rafik, the accused persons ...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 308 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
parties ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s: Mr. S.D.Sanjay,Sr. Advodate Mr. Mohit Agarwal Mr. Rahul Kumar Mr.Vishal Kumar Ms. Priya Gupta For the State Mr. Nalin Vilochan Tiwary, AC to GA 9 For BSTDCL Mr. Kumar A...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 824 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
a sand stone statue of Lord Budha having 70 ft height in Bhumi Sparsh posture, on the platform of a height of 30 ft. The learned counsel submitted that as per the Agreement, 30 ft high platform was to be constructed first and thereon the statue of Lord Budha was to be installed. As such, ...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 557 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
under sections 307, 379, 323, 324, 341, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code to which section 302 of the Indian Penal Code was added subsequently. 3. As per the prosecution case, the accused persons including the petitioner herein are said to have come variously armed with lathi, farsa etc. It is st...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 415 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
1408, 14th Floor, D.B. Ozone Beside Thakur Mall, Near Dahisar Check Naka, Mira Road, P.S. - Kashimira, East Thane Mumbai (401107) 4.Gyan Ranjan Thakur @ Anshu Thakur Son Of Gajendra Thakur Resident Of Village - Rupolia, Panchkadi, P.S. - Dhaka, District - Motihari, At Present Flat No .- 1408, 14th ...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 160 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
Biharsharif, Nalanda, where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Excise P.S. Case No. 766 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. aditi/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →