Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 53

Statute: Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)

Suresh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 428Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

Mr. Ajay Mukherjee, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The petitioners apprehends their arrest in connection with Katoriya P.S. Case No. 257 of 2020 registered under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504, 506, 3...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Ramji Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 862Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

counsel appearing on behalf of appellants and learned Spl. Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. This appeal has been filed against the order dated 19.10.2023 passed by learned Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.249 of 2024(3) dt.12-09-2024 2/2 Motihari, East Champaran in con...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Md. Afaque Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 580Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11360 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-92 Year-2023 Thana- KOTHI District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.Md. Afaque Ansari @ Afak Ansari @ Bechan Miyan @ Md. Afak Ansari S/O Rafique Ansari R/O Villa...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Ajmal Hussain v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 270Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

Sections 323, 354 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code. 4. Allegation against the petitioner is of matrimonial cruelty and of demand of dowry. 5. It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that petitioner Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5652 of 2024(6) dt.12-08-2024 2/3 happens to be husband of the compla...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Santosh Kumar Sahu v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 406Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6504 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-290 Year-2023 Thana- BAHERI District- Darbhanga ====================================================== 1.Santosh Kumar Sahu @ Santosh Sahu Son of Bilat Sahu @ Bilat Sah R/o vill - Barmattar, P...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Bharat Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 849Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11542 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-264 Year-2022 Thana- FOREST (GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL) District- Jamui ====================================================== 1.Bharat Yadav Son of Ganesh Yadav R/o vill - Baijala, P.S. - Jhajha,...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) 1 SCC 248

1978 1 SCC 248Supreme Court of India

70% Match

FACTS: Petitioner's passport was impounded without giving reasons. Held: Article 21 procedure must be 'just, fair, and reasonable', not arbitrary or oppressive. Ratio: Expanded Article 21 scope, introducing substantive due process principles into Indian jurisprudence....

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Vinod Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 655Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

the deceased with the petitioner on the date of occurrence. The dead body of the deceased has not been recovered. After completion of the investigation, on the basis of C.D.R., charge-sheet has been submitted against the petitioner under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code. Hence, the pet...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Ramji Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 660Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.249 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-380 Year-2018 Thana- GHORASAHAN District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.Ramji Mahto Son Of Jai Mangal Mahto Resident Of Village - Mahdeva, P.S. - Ghorasa...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Babloo Kumar v. The State Of Bihar Bihar

undefined INSC 798Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

despite the bar under Section 76 (2) of the Act, if on the basis of allegation made in the FIR, no offence under the said provision is made out. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner by submitting that the bar of Section 76(2) of t...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 2Next Page →