Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 34

Statute: Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)

Usha Devi v. The State Of Bihar Bihar

undefined INSC 414Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3921 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-48 Year-2023 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== 1.USHA DEVI W/o Shayamlal Ram R/o vill - Kakari Kundi, P.S. - Chainpur, Dist. ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Shahbaj Kuraishi Md. Sharif Quraishi v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 809Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5311 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-70 Year-2017 Thana- MEHSI District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.Shahbaj Kuraishi Md. Sharif Quraishi @ Sudhan Quraishi Village – Chaklahi P.S.- Mehs...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Parmanand Chauhan v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 374Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

for the offence registered under sections 342, 323, 147, 149, 307, 379 of the Indian Penal Code lodged on 13.07.2023 by the informant Jampa Devi. 3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that on 09.07.2023, when the informant’s husband was going to meet Md. Rafik, the accused persons ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Shakti Agarwal v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 134Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

figured in this case during the investigation as call has been made from the mobile of informant's brother-in-law and it has also come that the said mobile was in the possession of the petitioner. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 5501 of 2024(2) dt.07-02-2024 2/3 5. Counsel submits that petitioner i...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Bharat Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 124Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 222-02-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence under Section 33(1) / 66 of the Indian Forest (Bihar Amendment 1989) Ac...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Kumar Pushpak v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 682Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4141 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-765 Year-2023 Thana- PATRAKARNAGAR District- Patna ====================================================== Kumar Pushpak S/O Late Parmeshwer Prasad R/O Villag- Ruidhasa, Kali Mandir, P.S And Di...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Suresh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 768Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

Mr. Ajay Mukherjee, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The petitioners apprehends their arrest in connection with Katoriya P.S. Case No. 257 of 2020 registered under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504, 506, 3...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Bharat Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 633Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11542 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-264 Year-2022 Thana- FOREST (GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL) District- Jamui ====================================================== 1.Bharat Yadav Son of Ganesh Yadav R/o vill - Baijala, P.S. - Jhajha,...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Gudiya Devi v. The State Of Bihar Bihar

undefined INSC 310Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 217-02-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 342, 323, 379, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian P...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Lalita Kumari v. Government of UP (2013) 2 SCC 1

2013 2 SCC 1Supreme Court of India

69% Match

FACTS: Petition seeking action for police failure to register an FIR for kidnapping. Held: Registration of FIR is mandatory under Section 154 CrPC (now Section 173 BNSS) if the information discloses a cognizable offence. Ratio: No preliminary inquiry is permitted if cognizable offence is disclosed; ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 5Next Page →