Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 28

Statute: Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC)

Prabhu Dayal Singh v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 608Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

the Indian Penal Code and later on Section 304 of the Indian Penal Code was added. 3. Prosecution case, in short, is that accused persons including this petitioner armed with lathi, danda and pistol assaulted the informant. On hulla, all the accused persons fled away. ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Suresh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 646Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

Mr. Ajay Mukherjee, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The petitioners apprehends their arrest in connection with Katoriya P.S. Case No. 257 of 2020 registered under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504, 506, 3...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Arpan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 407Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

506, 379, 365, 364(A) of the Indian Penal Code read with section 141 of the Railways Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, the FIR has been lodged against the petitioner and other 10-11 unknown accused persons against whom there is an allegation that they have kidnapped the passenger from the runnin...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sanjay Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 685Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3918 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-375 Year-2023 Thana- RIGA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== 1.Sanjay Kumar Yadav Son of Rambali Rai R/o vill - Sakraul, ward no. 7, P.S. - Simra, Distt...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Jagdeo Das v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 419Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5489 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-645 Year-2020 Thana- MUNGER COMPLAINT CASE District- Munger ====================================================== Jagdeo Das S/O Late Bideshi Das R/O Village- Dhankar Jijho Sabour, P.S- Sabou...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Santosh Kumar Sahu v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 786Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6504 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-290 Year-2023 Thana- BAHERI District- Darbhanga ====================================================== 1.Santosh Kumar Sahu @ Santosh Sahu Son of Bilat Sahu @ Bilat Sah R/o vill - Barmattar, P...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) 1 SCC 248

1978 1 SCC 248Supreme Court of India

69% Match

FACTS: Petitioner's passport was impounded without giving reasons. Held: Article 21 procedure must be 'just, fair, and reasonable', not arbitrary or oppressive. Ratio: Expanded Article 21 scope, introducing substantive due process principles into Indian jurisprudence....

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Suresh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 647Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6493 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-257 Year-2020 Thana- KATORIYA District- Banka ====================================================== 1.Suresh Yadav Son Of Sugdev Yadav Village-Sijhua, P.S.-Katoriya, District- Banka. 2.Parwa...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Bharat Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 361Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11542 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-264 Year-2022 Thana- FOREST (GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL) District- Jamui ====================================================== 1.Bharat Yadav Son of Ganesh Yadav R/o vill - Baijala, P.S. - Jhajha,...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Bharat Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 271Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 222-02-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence under Section 33(1) / 66 of the Indian Forest (Bihar Amendment 1989) Ac...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 3Next Page →