Cases Citing Section 62
Statute: Indian Divorce Act, 1869 (indian-divorce-act-1869)
undefined INSC 741 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.3 of 2022 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10685 of 2019 ====================================================== Vinni Kumari presently residing at Bhawar Pokhar, Behind Khetan Market, P.S. - Pirbahore, district- Patna, Posted as Dre...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 824 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5652 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-243 Year-2023 Thana- NAWADAH COMPLAINT CASE District- Nawada ====================================================== AJMAL HUSSAIN @ MD. AJMAL HUSSAIN SON OF KURBAN ALI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - KO...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 590 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.789 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.22349 of 2012 ====================================================== 1.The Union Of India through Secretary Cum D.G., department of Post, Bhawan, New Delhi. 2.The Assistant Dire...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 576 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.516 of 2017 ====================================================== 1.Gopal Sharma S/o Late Jai Gobind Sharma, 2.Ramashray Sharma @ Munna Sharma, 3.Ranjit Sharma @ Chhote Sharma, 4.Sanjit Kumar @ Rintu Kumar, Sl. No. 2 to...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →1978 1 SCC 248 • Supreme Court of India
FACTS: Petitioner's passport was impounded without giving reasons. Held: Article 21 procedure must be 'just, fair, and reasonable', not arbitrary or oppressive. Ratio: Expanded Article 21 scope, introducing substantive due process principles into Indian jurisprudence....
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 437 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
physical relations with her. Learned APP further submitted that victim has herself stated the involvement of Harsh Bhushan Thakur (in Cr. Misc. No. 4784 of 2024) in the alleged commission of crime. 8. Having considered the submissions canvassed by learned counsel for both the parties and the mater...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 764 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
before the respondent no. 6. It transpired that the petitioner has been found unsuited on account of the fact that the marriage of the petitioner was solemnised with Ajeet Kumar Aryan after the cut Patna High Court CWJC No.426 of 2022 dt.26-11-2024 3/8 off date of 16.02.2018, when the Aam Sabha wa...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 460 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
the Bihar State Tourism Development Corporation (Annexure-5). Thereafter, an agreement was entered into between the parties on 29 th August, 2013. The consideration money was fixed as Rs.17.37 crores, Patna High Court C.R. No.12 of 2021(11) dt.12-01-2024 3/10 as per Clause 5 of the agreement. The ...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 139 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
Mr. Ajay Mukherjee, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The petitioners apprehends their arrest in connection with Katoriya P.S. Case No. 257 of 2020 registered under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504, 506, 3...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 551 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
construction over the suit property and parties were directed to maintain status quo without hearing the defendant/petitioner. No notice was issued as is reflected from the copy of the order sheet Patna High Court C.Misc. No.57 of 2024 dt.02-02-2024 2/4 attached with the present petition. ...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →