Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 59

Statute: Indian Divorce Act, 1869 (indian-divorce-act-1869)

Mukesh Kumar Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 371Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

the petitioner to pay Rs. 3,000/- per month to the opposite party and Rs. 1,000/- each per month for their three children, total being Rs. 6,000/-. 8. This Court is of the considered view that if, the petitioner is directed to pay Rs. 6,000/- he is required to pay towards maintenance allowance ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Harsh Bhushan Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 375Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4784 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-612 Year-2023 Thana- BUXAR District- Buxar ====================================================== Harsh Bhushan Thakur Son of Chandra Bhushan Thakur R/o vill - Tarkanala Main Road Buxar, P.S....

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Upendra Kumar v. Ashok Rai

undefined INSC 639Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.57 of 2024 ====================================================== Upendra Kumar @ Upendra Roy Son of Ashok Rai, Resident of Mauza, Mirpur, Bhuwal, P.O.- Dighwara, Police Station- Dighwara, District- Sar...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Upendra Kumar v. Ashok Rai

undefined INSC 136Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

अप क ब क्षित दवा ब खिल कर क । व वाद ब दननां क 29. 09. 2023 कलो आप क ब क्षित ह क तद । ह०/ - असपष 29. 09. 2023 ड वाक रसदी द दवाब खिल ब कय वा गय वा । व वाद ब दननां क 01. 11. 2023 S /R ह क तद । ह०/ - असपष 03.11.2023 Plaintiff Pairvi filed. Heard. Office issue show cause to defendant. Put up on 23.11.20...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 838Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

question of fact with regard the date of the marriage of the petitioner, which otherwise also, can not be determined without taking evidences. 9. So far the post of Aganwadi Sevika is concerned, it is a post created under the scheme and not holding any civil post, thus no prot...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Shiv Prasad Raut v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 645Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.973 of 2017 ====================================================== 1.Shiv Prasad Raut and Ors Son of Late Fakan Raut, Resident of Village- Rupaulia, P.O.- Kumhrar, P.S.- Fenhara, District- East Champaran. 2.Chitranjan Rai, 3.S...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
The Union Of India v. Lalan Kumar

undefined INSC 625Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.789 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.22349 of 2012 ====================================================== 1.The Union Of India through Secretary Cum D.G., department of Post, Bhawan, New Delhi. 2.The Assistant Dire...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

come under the purview of superstructure, as mentioned in Section 2(k) of the Act, 2008. 12. The Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of M/s Brahmaputra Infrastructure Ltd. (supra), after referring Sections 8, 9 and 22 of the Act 2008 has held in paragraph-5 of the said...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Bande Lal Sah v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 363Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3633 of 2018 ====================================================== Bande Lal Sah S/o Late Sundar Lal Sah, Resident of Village- Ekamba, P.S.- Jalalgarh, District- Purnea. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1.The State of Bihar. 2.Th...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

08.10.2013 as well as for payment of 5% of total amount, which was to be paid at the juncture of approval of clay model submitted by the petitioner, as per clause 5(ii) of the Agreement. The said writ application was dismissed and the petitioner then filed LPA No. 494 of 2014, which was disposed of...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 2Next Page →