Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 48

Statute: Indian Divorce Act, 1869 (indian-divorce-act-1869)

Shahbaj Kuraishi Md. Sharif Quraishi v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 105Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5311 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-70 Year-2017 Thana- MEHSI District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.Shahbaj Kuraishi Md. Sharif Quraishi @ Sudhan Quraishi Village – Chaklahi P.S.- Mehs...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

parties ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s: Mr. S.D.Sanjay,Sr. Advodate Mr. Mohit Agarwal Mr. Rahul Kumar Mr.Vishal Kumar Ms. Priya Gupta For the State Mr. Nalin Vilochan Tiwary, AC to GA 9 For BSTDCL Mr. Kumar A...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Nisha Bharti v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 379Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2438 of 2024 ====================================================== Nisha Bharti Wife of Nagendra Sharma, resident of Village-Naya Tola, Bhalui, P.S.-Chanan, District-Lakhisarai. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1.The State of Bih...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Pujan Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 892Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4489 of 2021 ====================================================== Pujan Thakur Son of Late Nawal Kishor Thakur, resident of Village- Parihar, Sonapatti, Ward No. 10, P.S. Parihar, Distt. - Sitamarhi (Bihar) - 843324. ... ......

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Gajendra Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 815Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5021 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-5645 Year-2022 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE District- Patna ====================================================== 1.Gajendra Thakur Son Of Late Devnath Thakur Resident Of Village - Rupolia, Pa...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

08.10.2013 as well as for payment of 5% of total amount, which was to be paid at the juncture of approval of clay model submitted by the petitioner, as per clause 5(ii) of the Agreement. The said writ application was dismissed and the petitioner then filed LPA No. 494 of 2014, which was disposed of...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 282Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

deems it fit and proper to refer to a judgment rendered by the learned Division Bench of this Court in the case of Babita Kumari v. The State of Bihar and others, reported in 2016 SCC Online Pat 9434, paragraphs no. 7 and 8 whereof are reproduced herein below:- “7. Having considered t...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Upendra Kumar v. Ashok Rai

undefined INSC 104Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.57 of 2024 ====================================================== Upendra Kumar @ Upendra Roy Son of Ashok Rai, Resident of Mauza, Mirpur, Bhuwal, P.O.- Dighwara, Police Station- Dighwara, District- Sar...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Lalita Kumari v. Government of UP (2013) 2 SCC 1

2013 2 SCC 1Supreme Court of India

69% Match

FACTS: Petition seeking action for police failure to register an FIR for kidnapping. Held: Registration of FIR is mandatory under Section 154 CrPC (now Section 173 BNSS) if the information discloses a cognizable offence. Ratio: No preliminary inquiry is permitted if cognizable offence is disclosed; ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Baby Singh v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 666Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

deceased Dinesh Singh is not ready to give affidavit and as such till date the pension or other retiral benefits has not been distributed proportionately. 7. At this juncture, learned Advocate for the respondents submitted that since there is a dispute with regard to the claim and as such they have...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 3Next Page →