Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 45

Statute: Indian Divorce Act, 1869 (indian-divorce-act-1869)

Gopal Sharma v. Raghu Bansh Sharma

undefined INSC 408Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.516 of 2017 ====================================================== 1.Gopal Sharma S/o Late Jai Gobind Sharma, 2.Ramashray Sharma @ Munna Sharma, 3.Ranjit Sharma @ Chhote Sharma, 4.Sanjit Kumar @ Rintu Kumar, Sl. No. 2 to...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Bande Lal Sah v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 609Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

Divisional Public Grievance Redressal Officer, Purnea has not been communicated. 3. Learned counsel for the State submits that order has been passed on 07.11.2017 on the basis of material available on record and he further submits that the said land in question in Title Suit No.111/1970 has been fi...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sheo Charan Dalmia v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 777Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

(ii) further for direction to the respondents particularly respondent no. 3, 4 & 7 to abstain from creating unnecessary and unreasonable restrictions upon the petitioners in exercising their right to Patna High Court CWJC No.729 of 2024(2) dt.25-04-2024 3/5 property including right to alie...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

a sand stone statue of Lord Budha having 70 ft height in Bhumi Sparsh posture, on the platform of a height of 30 ft. The learned counsel submitted that as per the Agreement, 30 ft high platform was to be constructed first and thereon the statue of Lord Budha was to be installed. As such, ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Gajendra Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 390Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 404-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. 2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5021 of 2024(4) dt.04-07-2024 2/3 the offence punishable under sections 323 , 4...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
KS Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017) 10 SCC 1

2017 10 SCC 1Supreme Court of India

69% Match

FACTS: Challenged Aadhaar biometrics scheme as violating privacy. Held: Right to Privacy is a fundamental right guaranteed under Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution of India. Ratio: Privacy is intrinsic to life and personal liberty, subject to proportionality tests for state restrictions....

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 834Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

the Bidhyapati Mandir, Samastipur, where the marriage was solemnised categorically demonstrates that the marriage of the petitioner with Ajeet Kumar Aryan was solemnised before the cut off date and as Patna High Court CWJC No.426 of 2022 dt.26-11-2024 4/8 such non-selection of the petitioner by tr...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Krishnadeo Poddar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 454Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.10 of 2020 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12370 of 2015 ====================================================== Krishnadeo Poddar Son of Late Sitabi Poddar, Retired Head Electrician, Muzaffapur Electric Supply Circle, res...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Ramji Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 290Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.249 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-380 Year-2018 Thana- GHORASAHAN District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.Ramji Mahto Son Of Jai Mangal Mahto Resident Of Village - Mahdeva, P.S. - Ghorasa...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Ajmal Hussain v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 111Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

Sections 323, 354 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code. 4. Allegation against the petitioner is of matrimonial cruelty and of demand of dowry. 5. It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that petitioner Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5652 of 2024(6) dt.12-08-2024 2/3 happens to be husband of the compla...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 4Next Page →