Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 44

Statute: Indian Divorce Act, 1869 (indian-divorce-act-1869)

Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) 4 SCC 225

1973 4 SCC 225Supreme Court of India

70% Match

FACTS: Challenged Kerala Land Reforms Act. 13-judge bench reviewed parliament's power to amend the Constitution. Held: Parliament can amend any part of the Constitution, including Fundamental Rights, but cannot alter or destroy the 'Basic Structure' of the Constitution. Ratio: Basic Structure doctri...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

08.10.2013 as well as for payment of 5% of total amount, which was to be paid at the juncture of approval of clay model submitted by the petitioner, as per clause 5(ii) of the Agreement. The said writ application was dismissed and the petitioner then filed LPA No. 494 of 2014, which was disposed of...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.3 of 2022 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10685 of 2019 ====================================================== Vinni Kumari presently residing at Bhawar Pokhar, Behind Khetan Market, P.S. - Pirbahore, district- Patna, Posted as Dre...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Upendra Kumar v. Ashok Rai

undefined INSC 284Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

अप क ब क्षित दवा ब खिल कर क । व वाद ब दननां क 29. 09. 2023 कलो आप क ब क्षित ह क तद । ह०/ - असपष 29. 09. 2023 ड वाक रसदी द दवाब खिल ब कय वा गय वा । व वाद ब दननां क 01. 11. 2023 S /R ह क तद । ह०/ - असपष 03.11.2023 Plaintiff Pairvi filed. Heard. Office issue show cause to defendant. Put up on 23.11.20...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Upendra Kumar v. Ashok Rai

undefined INSC 148Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

construction over the suit property and parties were directed to maintain status quo without hearing the defendant/petitioner. No notice was issued as is reflected from the copy of the order sheet Patna High Court C.Misc. No.57 of 2024 dt.02-02-2024 2/4 attached with the present petition. ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Upendra Kumar v. Ashok Rai

undefined INSC 279Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.57 of 2024 ====================================================== Upendra Kumar @ Upendra Roy Son of Ashok Rai, Resident of Mauza, Mirpur, Bhuwal, P.O.- Dighwara, Police Station- Dighwara, District- Sar...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Gajendra Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 755Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 404-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. 2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5021 of 2024(4) dt.04-07-2024 2/3 the offence punishable under sections 323 , 4...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar (2014) 8 SCC 273

2014 8 SCC 273Supreme Court of India

70% Match

FACTS: Anticipatory bail application in a Section 498A IPC cruelty case. Held: Arrest should not be the default action in offences carrying punishment of less than 7 years. Ratio: Police must comply with Section 41A CrPC (now Section 35 BNSS) notice guidelines before executing arrest....

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Bande Lal Sah v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 244Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

Divisional Public Grievance Redressal Officer, Purnea has not been communicated. 3. Learned counsel for the State submits that order has been passed on 07.11.2017 on the basis of material available on record and he further submits that the said land in question in Title Suit No.111/1970 has been fi...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 810Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

marriage of the petitioner was solemnised on 29.11.2017 itself, is the contention of learned Advocate for the petitioner. The order of the Collector, Samastipur is under challenge in the case in hand. 6. Learned Advocate for the petitioner contended that the certificate issued by the prie...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 2Next Page →