Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 36

Statute: Indian Divorce Act, 1869 (indian-divorce-act-1869)

Mukesh Kumar Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 263Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

Munger ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s: Mr. Anurag Saurav, Adv. For the Respondent/s: Mr. Anand Kishore Choudhary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIBEK CHAUDHURI O...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Upendra Kumar v. Ashok Rai

undefined INSC 161Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

अप क ब क्षित दवा ब खिल कर क । व वाद ब दननां क 29. 09. 2023 कलो आप क ब क्षित ह क तद । ह०/ - असपष 29. 09. 2023 ड वाक रसदी द दवाब खिल ब कय वा गय वा । व वाद ब दननां क 01. 11. 2023 S /R ह क तद । ह०/ - असपष 03.11.2023 Plaintiff Pairvi filed. Heard. Office issue show cause to defendant. Put up on 23.11.20...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Shahbaj Kuraishi Md. Sharif Quraishi v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 537Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5311 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-70 Year-2017 Thana- MEHSI District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.Shahbaj Kuraishi Md. Sharif Quraishi @ Sudhan Quraishi Village – Chaklahi P.S.- Mehs...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Virendra Mukhiya v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 195Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

17.520 liters of Nepali Saufi wine has been recovered from the house of petitioner. 4. It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that alleged recovery has been effected from the house, which is in joint possession of the family members. Petitioner lives out of Bihar for his livelihood and he has got ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Mukesh Kumar Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 582Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL REVISION No.148 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-0 Thana- District- Munger ====================================================== Mukesh Kumar Mandal @ Mukesh Mandal, Son of Raj Kumar Mandal, Resident of Village- Lal Darwaza, P.S.- Kotwali, ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
The Union Of India v. Lalan Kumar

undefined INSC 730Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.789 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.22349 of 2012 ====================================================== 1.The Union Of India through Secretary Cum D.G., department of Post, Bhawan, New Delhi. 2.The Assistant Dire...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 387Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

marriage of the petitioner was solemnised on 29.11.2017 itself, is the contention of learned Advocate for the petitioner. The order of the Collector, Samastipur is under challenge in the case in hand. 6. Learned Advocate for the petitioner contended that the certificate issued by the prie...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Harendra Prasad Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 138Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

petitioner. Therefore, the same has to held as bad, illegal, contrary to the provisions of Rule 27(ii) of the Control Order and has to necessarily set aside. 9. Having regard to the above facts and circumstances and the law laid down by this Hon’ble...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 663Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

the Bidhyapati Mandir, Samastipur, where the marriage was solemnised categorically demonstrates that the marriage of the petitioner with Ajeet Kumar Aryan was solemnised before the cut off date and as Patna High Court CWJC No.426 of 2022 dt.26-11-2024 4/8 such non-selection of the petitioner by tr...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 684Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

before the respondent no. 6. It transpired that the petitioner has been found unsuited on account of the fact that the marriage of the petitioner was solemnised with Ajeet Kumar Aryan after the cut Patna High Court CWJC No.426 of 2022 dt.26-11-2024 3/8 off date of 16.02.2018, when the Aam Sabha wa...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 4Next Page →