Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 18

Statute: Indian Contract Act, 1872 (indian-contract-act-1872)

Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar (2014) 8 SCC 273

2014 8 SCC 273Supreme Court of India

69% Match

FACTS: Anticipatory bail application in a Section 498A IPC cruelty case. Held: Arrest should not be the default action in offences carrying punishment of less than 7 years. Ratio: Police must comply with Section 41A CrPC (now Section 35 BNSS) notice guidelines before executing arrest....

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Upendra Kumar v. Ashok Rai

undefined INSC 189Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

दी द एव फ दी स वा बितू त क क स वा स्थि ब वववा ब दत जमदी न पर हलो रह क ब नमर्मा ण कवा यर्य कवा फ लोटलो ग्रवा फ दवा ब खिल ब कयवा गयवा और ब नव क दन ब कयवा गयवा ब क मददवा लहन मदकदमवा कदी जवा नकवा रदी क क Patna High Court C.Misc. No.57 of 2024 dt.02-02-2024 3/4 बिवावजतू न्यवा यवा लय नहदी आकर ब वववा ब...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 893Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

of fact with regard the date of the marriage, the same ought not to be considered while exercising the writ jurisdiction. The petitioner has always been at liberty to approach before the Civil Court of competent jurisdiction to settle the disputed question of fact. 8. This Court has heard the lea...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Bande Lal Sah v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 879Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

Sub Divisional Public Grievances Redressal Officer, Sadar Purnea and after production, the same may be quashed and further relief is for quashing the notice dated 07.11.2017 issued under the signature Patna High Court CWJC No.3633 of 2018(2) dt.17-10-2024 2/4 of Circle Office, Jalalgarh, Purnea by...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Dipak Kumar Jha v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 797Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1507 of 2017 ====================================================== Dipak Kumar Jha Son of Late Shyam Charan Jha, Grand Son of Late Tara Charan Jha @ Lalan Babu Resident of Village - Mahisi, P.O. and P.S. - Mahisi, ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Upendra Kumar v. Ashok Rai

undefined INSC 117Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 02-02-2024 The matter has been taken up on mentioning being made on behalf of the petitioner. 2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 23.11.2023 passed by learned Subordinate Judge-I, ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Lalita Kumari v. Government of UP (2013) 2 SCC 1

2013 2 SCC 1Supreme Court of India

69% Match

FACTS: Petition seeking action for police failure to register an FIR for kidnapping. Held: Registration of FIR is mandatory under Section 154 CrPC (now Section 173 BNSS) if the information discloses a cognizable offence. Ratio: No preliminary inquiry is permitted if cognizable offence is disclosed; ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
The Union Of India v. Lalan Kumar

undefined INSC 318Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.789 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.22349 of 2012 ====================================================== 1.The Union Of India through Secretary Cum D.G., department of Post, Bhawan, New Delhi. 2.The Assistant Dire...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Rajesh Tewari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 870Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

If it is so, the disciplinary proceedings shall be strictly conducted in accordance with the relevant Disciplinary Regulations or Bihar Government Servants (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules, 2005 and completed within a period of six months from the date of receipt of this order. If the char...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Birendra Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 225Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

especially the respondent No.3 to issue Rent Receipt in name of the petitioner for the land in issue after reconstructing Reg. II, which is reported damaged, or disposed of the application made to him several times by a reasoned and speaking order as the matter is...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 4Next Page →