Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section UNDEFINED

Statute: Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hindu-marriage-act-1955)

a sand stone statue of Lord Budha having 70 ft height in Bhumi Sparsh posture, on the platform of a height of 30 ft. The learned counsel submitted that as per the Agreement, 30 ft high platform was to be constructed first and thereon the statue of Lord Budha was to be installed. As such, ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
The Union Of India v. Lalan Kumar

undefined INSC 556Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.789 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.22349 of 2012 ====================================================== 1.The Union Of India through Secretary Cum D.G., department of Post, Bhawan, New Delhi. 2.The Assistant Dire...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 296Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

for the respective parties and also perused the materials available on record. From the order passed by the Collector, Samastipur, prima facie, it appears that the claim of the petitioner that her Patna High Court CWJC No.426 of 2022 dt.26-11-2024 5/8 marriage was solemnised before the cut of...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Kapil Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 163Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

fulfillment of dowry demand. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that petitioner is father-in-law of the deceased and he has no concern with the mess a...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Gajendra Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 565Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

1408, 14th Floor, D.B. Ozone Beside Thakur Mall, Near Dahisar Check Naka, Mira Road, P.S. - Kashimira, East Thane Mumbai (401107) 4.Gyan Ranjan Thakur @ Anshu Thakur Son Of Gajendra Thakur Resident Of Village - Rupolia, Panchkadi, P.S. - Dhaka, District - Motihari, At Present Flat No .- 1408, 14th ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Md. Afaque Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 405Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

for the parties. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a complaint case punishable for the offence under Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 / 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11360 of 2024(3) dt.29-04-2024 2/3 3. Petitioners alongwith other co...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Shahbaj Kuraishi Md. Sharif Quraishi v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 386Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5311 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-70 Year-2017 Thana- MEHSI District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.Shahbaj Kuraishi Md. Sharif Quraishi @ Sudhan Quraishi Village – Chaklahi P.S.- Mehs...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Upendra Kumar v. Ashok Rai

undefined INSC 364Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 02-02-2024 The matter has been taken up on mentioning being made on behalf of the petitioner. 2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 23.11.2023 passed by learned Subordinate Judge-I, ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Santosh Kumar Sahu v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 277Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6504 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-290 Year-2023 Thana- BAHERI District- Darbhanga ====================================================== 1.Santosh Kumar Sahu @ Santosh Sahu Son of Bilat Sahu @ Bilat Sah R/o vill - Barmattar, P...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Ajmal Hussain v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 178Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

ORDER 612-08-2024Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. Despite valid service of notice, nobody appears on behalf of the Opposite Party No. 2. 3. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a complaint case registered for the offences punishable und...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 3Next Page →