Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section UNDEFINED

Statute: Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hindu-marriage-act-1955)

Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 407Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

73% Match

the Bidhyapati Mandir, Samastipur, where the marriage was solemnised categorically demonstrates that the marriage of the petitioner with Ajeet Kumar Aryan was solemnised before the cut off date and as Patna High Court CWJC No.426 of 2022 dt.26-11-2024 4/8 such non-selection of the petitioner by tr...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 202Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

73% Match

appointment letter and in his place, the respondent no. 8 was selected as Aganwadi Sevika. 4. On the other hand, the respondent no. 8 obtained only 58.60 % marks, much less than the petitioner, who obtained 76% marks, nonetheless her case was placed for consideration and, as such,...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Upendra Kumar v. Ashok Rai

undefined INSC 478Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

73% Match

दी द एव फ दी स वा बितू त क क स वा स्थि ब वववा ब दत जमदी न पर हलो रह क ब नमर्मा ण कवा यर्य कवा फ लोटलो ग्रवा फ दवा ब खिल ब कयवा गयवा और ब नव क दन ब कयवा गयवा ब क मददवा लहन मदकदमवा कदी जवा नकवा रदी क क Patna High Court C.Misc. No.57 of 2024 dt.02-02-2024 3/4 बिवावजतू न्यवा यवा लय नहदी आकर ब वववा ब...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 526Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

73% Match

available. It is apt and proper to refer the judgment rendered by this Court in the case of Parvati Devi @ Parvati Singh Vs. The State of Bihar and Ors., reported in 2024 (1) BLJ 178 held as follows: Patna High Court CWJC No.426 of 2022 dt.26-11-2024 6/8 “5. This Court would also refer ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 403Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

73% Match

before the respondent no. 6. It transpired that the petitioner has been found unsuited on account of the fact that the marriage of the petitioner was solemnised with Ajeet Kumar Aryan after the cut Patna High Court CWJC No.426 of 2022 dt.26-11-2024 3/8 off date of 16.02.2018, when the Aam Sabha wa...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Upendra Kumar v. Ashok Rai

undefined INSC 504Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

73% Match

अप क ब क्षित दवा ब खिल कर क । व वाद ब दननां क 29. 09. 2023 कलो आप क ब क्षित ह क तद । ह०/ - असपष 29. 09. 2023 ड वाक रसदी द दवाब खिल ब कय वा गय वा । व वाद ब दननां क 01. 11. 2023 S /R ह क तद । ह०/ - असपष 03.11.2023 Plaintiff Pairvi filed. Heard. Office issue show cause to defendant. Put up on 23.11.20...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 487Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

73% Match

question of fact with regard the date of the marriage of the petitioner, which otherwise also, can not be determined without taking evidences. 9. So far the post of Aganwadi Sevika is concerned, it is a post created under the scheme and not holding any civil post, thus no prot...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Vikki Kumar Gupta v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 817Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

72% Match

registered for the offence/s punishable u/s 376 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 4. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is alleged to have established physical relationship with the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3771 of 2024(2) dt.24-01-2024 2/3 victim on the pretext of the marriage....

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Upendra Kumar v. Ashok Rai

undefined INSC 618Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

72% Match

construction over the suit property and parties were directed to maintain status quo without hearing the defendant/petitioner. No notice was issued as is reflected from the copy of the order sheet Patna High Court C.Misc. No.57 of 2024 dt.02-02-2024 2/4 attached with the present petition. ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 487Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

72% Match

marriage of the petitioner was solemnised on 29.11.2017 itself, is the contention of learned Advocate for the petitioner. The order of the Collector, Samastipur is under challenge in the case in hand. 6. Learned Advocate for the petitioner contended that the certificate issued by the prie...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 1Next Page →