Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 58

Statute: Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (consumer-protection-act-2019)

Mukesh Kumar Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 103Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

the final order of maintenance under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C., passed in Maintenance Case No. 46 of 2016 by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court at Munger on 19 th November, 2018, whereby and Patna High Court CR. REV. No.148 of 2019 dt.24-04-2024 2/4 whereunder the learned Principal ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

Mufasil, District- Begusarai, Presently residing at C/O Bhushan Jee, Sakuntala Kunj, Subhakarmana Colony, East Laxminagar, P.S. - Ramkrishna Nagar, Patna presently posted as Dresser in O.T. - 4, Patna Medical College Hospital, Patna. 7.Ajay Kumar Son of Suryabansh Singh presently residing at C/o, M...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Manjit Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 171Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner has been made accused Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3761 of 2024(2) dt.12-02-2024 2/3 in this case only because of the co...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

08.10.2013 as well as for payment of 5% of total amount, which was to be paid at the juncture of approval of clay model submitted by the petitioner, as per clause 5(ii) of the Agreement. The said writ application was dismissed and the petitioner then filed LPA No. 494 of 2014, which was disposed of...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Baby Singh v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 584Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

Accountant General. 2. The petitioners are daughter-in-law and son of the erstwhile employee (Surendra Prasad Singh), has approached this Court seeking a direction upon the respondents to ensure the Patna High Court CWJC No.1393 of 2024(2) dt.13-08-2024 2/4 payment of proportionate share of the pe...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Kaushal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 779Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2681 of 2019 ====================================================== Kaushal Kumar S/o Late Jagdish Kumar Vidyarthi R/o Village- Muhabbatpur, PO- Muhabbatpurvia Dewaiya Kothi, District- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s Versus ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar (2014) 8 SCC 273

2014 8 SCC 273Supreme Court of India

69% Match

FACTS: Anticipatory bail application in a Section 498A IPC cruelty case. Held: Arrest should not be the default action in offences carrying punishment of less than 7 years. Ratio: Police must comply with Section 41A CrPC (now Section 35 BNSS) notice guidelines before executing arrest....

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Mukesh Kumar Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 134Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

the petitioner to pay Rs. 3,000/- per month to the opposite party and Rs. 1,000/- each per month for their three children, total being Rs. 6,000/-. 8. This Court is of the considered view that if, the petitioner is directed to pay Rs. 6,000/- he is required to pay towards maintenance allowance ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Rajesh Tewari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 702Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

case of owner is from the Nagaland whereas auction advertised through newspaper was in State of Bihar. These things have not been taken note of for these many years in umpteen number of excise cases. However, the officials are keep on committing one or the other error whether it is knowingly or unk...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Mukesh Kumar Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 112Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

some extent so that the petitioner can make payment of the maintenance allowance. 5. I have perused the materials on record. The opposite party in her evidence admitted in cross-examination that the Patna High Court CR. REV. No.148 of 2019 dt.24-04-2024 3/4 petitioner is a day labourer. There is o...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 3Next Page →