Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 56

Statute: Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (consumer-protection-act-2019)

Rajesh Tewari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 209Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

is knowingly or unknowingly, there is inaction on the part of the superiors against such erring officials despite our earlier orders in not following or adhering to the relevant rules and procedures. Patna High Court CWJC No.1022 of 2021 dt.09-12-2024 6/12 In the present case, in not recording the...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Shahbaj Kuraishi Md. Sharif Quraishi v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 175Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5311 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-70 Year-2017 Thana- MEHSI District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.Shahbaj Kuraishi Md. Sharif Quraishi @ Sudhan Quraishi Village – Chaklahi P.S.- Mehs...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Rajesh Tewari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 778Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

case of owner is from the Nagaland whereas auction advertised through newspaper was in State of Bihar. These things have not been taken note of for these many years in umpteen number of excise cases. However, the officials are keep on committing one or the other error whether it is knowingly or unk...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Mukesh Kumar Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 494Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

some extent so that the petitioner can make payment of the maintenance allowance. 5. I have perused the materials on record. The opposite party in her evidence admitted in cross-examination that the Patna High Court CR. REV. No.148 of 2019 dt.24-04-2024 3/4 petitioner is a day labourer. There is o...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Kaushal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 229Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 12-02-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2.The present writ application has been filed for quashing the letter dated 23.05.2018 issued vide memo no-2277 under the signature of respon...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL REVISION No.12 of 2021 ====================================================== Rang Vikalp registered office at Studio Variation Artists Studio Sardar Patel Colony, Patliputra Colony Telephone Exchange Road behind SIS Security Office, Kurj...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Mukesh Kumar Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 501Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL REVISION No.148 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-0 Thana- District- Munger ====================================================== Mukesh Kumar Mandal @ Mukesh Mandal, Son of Raj Kumar Mandal, Resident of Village- Lal Darwaza, P.S.- Kotwali, ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Mukesh Kumar Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 765Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

the petitioner to pay Rs. 3,000/- per month to the opposite party and Rs. 1,000/- each per month for their three children, total being Rs. 6,000/-. 8. This Court is of the considered view that if, the petitioner is directed to pay Rs. 6,000/- he is required to pay towards maintenance allowance ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Rajesh Tewari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 142Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

as scrap. 6. The aforementioned decision has been taken by us in order to give quietus to the litigation, otherwise certain disputed facts are involved in order to investigate as to why petitioner got his vehicle insured on 05.02.2020 for about Rs.14 lacs with reference to the vehicle was 7 years o...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Baby Singh v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 780Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

Accountant General. 2. The petitioners are daughter-in-law and son of the erstwhile employee (Surendra Prasad Singh), has approached this Court seeking a direction upon the respondents to ensure the Patna High Court CWJC No.1393 of 2024(2) dt.13-08-2024 2/4 payment of proportionate share of the pe...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 2Next Page →