Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 51

Statute: Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (consumer-protection-act-2019)

Manohar Lal v. State

undefined INSC 897Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

Biharsharif, Nalanda, where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Excise P.S. Case No. 766 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. aditi/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

08.10.2013 as well as for payment of 5% of total amount, which was to be paid at the juncture of approval of clay model submitted by the petitioner, as per clause 5(ii) of the Agreement. The said writ application was dismissed and the petitioner then filed LPA No. 494 of 2014, which was disposed of...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Kaushal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 558Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 12-02-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2.The present writ application has been filed for quashing the letter dated 23.05.2018 issued vide memo no-2277 under the signature of respon...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Dhurendra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 821Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

the prosecution case, the petitioner is said to have stolen a Tractor. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in this case. 5. It is also submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has clean ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

a sand stone statue of Lord Budha having 70 ft height in Bhumi Sparsh posture, on the platform of a height of 30 ft. The learned counsel submitted that as per the Agreement, 30 ft high platform was to be constructed first and thereon the statue of Lord Budha was to be installed. As such, ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sudha Devi v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 816Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.505 of 2020 ====================================================== 1.Sudha Devi W/o Manoj Kumar Das @ Manoj Das resident of Village - Purvi Kargahiya, P.S. - Bettiah Mufassil, District- West Champaran. 2.Manoj Kumar Das @ Manoj...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 395Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

deems it fit and proper to refer to a judgment rendered by the learned Division Bench of this Court in the case of Babita Kumari v. The State of Bihar and others, reported in 2016 SCC Online Pat 9434, paragraphs no. 7 and 8 whereof are reproduced herein below:- “7. Having considered t...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

P.S.- Alamganj, District- Patna, presently posted as Dresser in R.S.B. O.T. No. 5, Patna Medical College and Hospital, Patna. 23.Chandan Kumar S/o Sudama Singh resident of Village- Karma, Post- Karma, Via- Nasriganj, P.S.- Karakat (Gorari), District- Rohtas, presently posted as Dresser in R.S.B. O....

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

but a ‘superstructure’ erected/installed on the platform of 30 ft height and the statue encompasses the word ‘superstructure’ mentioned in Section 2(k) of the Act 2008. The learned counsel next Patna High Court C.R. No.12 of 2021(11) dt.12-01-2024 5/10 submitted that, as per Clause 5(ii) of the Ag...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Upendra Kumar v. Ashok Rai

undefined INSC 307Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

construction over the suit property and parties were directed to maintain status quo without hearing the defendant/petitioner. No notice was issued as is reflected from the copy of the order sheet Patna High Court C.Misc. No.57 of 2024 dt.02-02-2024 2/4 attached with the present petition. ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 3Next Page →