Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 394

Statute: Companies Act, 2013 (companies-act-2013)

Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 756Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

cancelling her selection as well as the procedure adopted by them prior to passing such order. 8. For the reasons aforesaid, the Letters Patent Appeal, being devoid of merit, stands dismissed.” Patna High Court CWJC No.426 of 2022 dt.26-11-2024 8/8 10. Considering the aforesaid facts and the settl...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

P.S.- Alamganj, District- Patna, presently posted as Dresser in R.S.B. O.T. No. 5, Patna Medical College and Hospital, Patna. 23.Chandan Kumar S/o Sudama Singh resident of Village- Karma, Post- Karma, Via- Nasriganj, P.S.- Karakat (Gorari), District- Rohtas, presently posted as Dresser in R.S.B. O....

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Nagendra Chaubey v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 106Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.839 of 2024 ====================================================== Nagendra Chaubey S/o Sri Sukh ram Chaubey Resident of village-Hirpur, Post-Dalupur District-Buxar. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1.The State of Bihar through th...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 873Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

question of fact with regard the date of the marriage of the petitioner, which otherwise also, can not be determined without taking evidences. 9. So far the post of Aganwadi Sevika is concerned, it is a post created under the scheme and not holding any civil post, thus no prot...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sita Ram Singh v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 309Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.414 of 2022 ====================================================== 1.Sita Ram Singh, son of Late Mathura Singh, Resident of Village-Tarhari, Police Station-Halsi, District-Lakhisarai. 2.Priya Shankar Sah, son of Late Shree Kant...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Md. Shahid v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 258Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.599 of 2024 ====================================================== Md. Shahid Son of Md. Minhajul Haque Resident of Mohallah- Alamganj, P.O.- Alamganj, P.S.- Alamganj, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1.The State ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Krishnadeo Poddar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 464Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.10 of 2020 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12370 of 2015 ====================================================== Krishnadeo Poddar Son of Late Sitabi Poddar, Retired Head Electrician, Muzaffapur Electric Supply Circle, res...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Md. Afaque Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 425Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11360 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-92 Year-2023 Thana- KOTHI District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.Md. Afaque Ansari @ Afak Ansari @ Bechan Miyan @ Md. Afak Ansari S/O Rafique Ansari R/O Villa...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

in holding that it has no jurisdiction to decide the matter. Undisputedly, the authority mentioned in paragraph-22 of the Agreement has only jurisdiction over the subject matter of the contract. 14. The revision application is accordingly dismissed. 15. As it has already been submitted that the ma...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) 4 SCC 225

1973 4 SCC 225Supreme Court of India

69% Match

FACTS: Challenged Kerala Land Reforms Act. 13-judge bench reviewed parliament's power to amend the Constitution. Held: Parliament can amend any part of the Constitution, including Fundamental Rights, but cannot alter or destroy the 'Basic Structure' of the Constitution. Ratio: Basic Structure doctri...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 3Next Page →