Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 340

Statute: Companies Act, 2013 (companies-act-2013)

08.10.2013 as well as for payment of 5% of total amount, which was to be paid at the juncture of approval of clay model submitted by the petitioner, as per clause 5(ii) of the Agreement. The said writ application was dismissed and the petitioner then filed LPA No. 494 of 2014, which was disposed of...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

which was to be based on a platform of 30 ft height. As such, the work performed by the petitioner in pursuance of the contract comes under the definition of ‘work contract’ defined in Section 2(k) of the Act 2008. Therefore, the Arbitration Tribunal has jurisdiction over the disput...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

any of its works relating to construction, repairs or maintenance of any building or superstructure, dam, weir, canal, reservoir, tank, lake, road all types of bridge, culvert, factory or work shops or of such other work of the State Government or, as the case may be, of the public ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

petitioner submitted clay model of statue of Lord Budha in Bhumi Sparsh posture which was approved by the respondents, amongst other bidders. The petitioner also became successful in a financial bid and thereafter work order was issued to him, vide letter no. 487 dated 14.08.2013, issued by...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Ramji Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 342Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

counsel appearing on behalf of appellants and learned Spl. Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. This appeal has been filed against the order dated 19.10.2023 passed by learned Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.249 of 2024(3) dt.12-09-2024 2/2 Motihari, East Champaran in con...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Shahida Khatoon v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 478Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

of the petition. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. The petitioners have filed the instant application for grant of regular bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitio...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) 1 SCC 248

1978 1 SCC 248Supreme Court of India

68% Match

FACTS: Petitioner's passport was impounded without giving reasons. Held: Article 21 procedure must be 'just, fair, and reasonable', not arbitrary or oppressive. Ratio: Expanded Article 21 scope, introducing substantive due process principles into Indian jurisprudence....

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Md. Arshad v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 159Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

67% Match

(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Beur P.S. Case No. 366 of 2023 subject to the following conditions: (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner. (II) The petitioner sh...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sanjay Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 568Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

67% Match

as also the petitioners having no criminal antecedent, let the petitioners, abovenamed, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Riga P.S. Case No. ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sharwan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 862Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

67% Match

that he got secret information that the accused persons including the petitioner along with unknown accused were active members of Maoist movement are planning to commit extortion, recruitment of new Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.13733 of 2024(4) dt.10-05-2024 2/2 recruits including carrying out d...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 2Next Page →