Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 97

Statute: Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC)

Chandradeo Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 658Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4 of 2023 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6909 of 2022 ====================================================== Chandradeo Mandal, Son of Dukhi Mandal, resident of Village- Khagor, P.S.- Kiul, District- Lakhisarai. ... ......

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Harsh Bhushan Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 675Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4784 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-612 Year-2023 Thana- BUXAR District- Buxar ====================================================== Harsh Bhushan Thakur Son of Chandra Bhushan Thakur R/o vill - Tarkanala Main Road Buxar, P.S....

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Vikash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 335Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

Party/Informant and Mr. Binod Kumar, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Parasbigha P.S. Case No. 114 of 2023 registered under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. As per the allegation made ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sheikh Zulfakar v. The State Of Bihar Bihar

undefined INSC 595Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

the deceased with various weapons and because of the same the deceased has died. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in this case. 5. It is also submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Manish Kumar Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 651Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

under sections 307, 379, 323, 324, 341, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code to which section 302 of the Indian Penal Code was added subsequently. 3. As per the prosecution case, the accused persons including the petitioner herein are said to have come variously armed with lathi, farsa etc. It is st...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Prabhu Dayal Singh v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 165Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

was added. 3. Prosecution case, in short, is that accused persons including this petitioner armed with lathi, danda and pistol assaulted the informant. On hulla, all the accused persons fled away. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9415 of 2024(3) dt.10-04-2024 2/3 4. Learned counsel for the petitione...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Manohar Lal v. State

undefined INSC 213Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

Biharsharif, Nalanda, where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Excise P.S. Case No. 766 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. aditi/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Md. Nakib Alam v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 276Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12499 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-29 Year-2017 Thana- SIMRI BAKHTIYARPUR District- Saharsa ====================================================== Md. Nakib Alam @ Nakib Ahmad @ Md. Nakib Ahmad Son Of Md. Rafi Ahmad @ Md. Rafi...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Lilawati Devi, (f), Aged About 21 Years v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 534Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4417 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-33 Year-2023 Thana- SIMRI District- Buxar ====================================================== 1.Lilawati Devi, (F), aged about 21 years, Wife of Late Rampravesh Sah, Resident of Village - ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) 4 SCC 225

1973 4 SCC 225Supreme Court of India

68% Match

FACTS: Challenged Kerala Land Reforms Act. 13-judge bench reviewed parliament's power to amend the Constitution. Held: Parliament can amend any part of the Constitution, including Fundamental Rights, but cannot alter or destroy the 'Basic Structure' of the Constitution. Ratio: Basic Structure doctri...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 4Next Page →