Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 461

Statute: Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC)

Sanjay Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 256Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3918 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-375 Year-2023 Thana- RIGA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== 1.Sanjay Kumar Yadav Son of Rambali Rai R/o vill - Sakraul, ward no. 7, P.S. - Simra, Distt...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Manohar Lal v. State

undefined INSC 238Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

Biharsharif, Nalanda, where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Excise P.S. Case No. 766 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. aditi/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

Pramod Sah presently residing at C/o Bachchu Rajak, Mohalla- Mahendru, Near Malariya Office, P.S.- Sultanganj, District- Patna, presently posted as Dresser in the Department of Surgical I.C.U. Patna Medical College and Hospital, Patna. 12.Pushpa Rani W/o Purushottam Das presently residing at - C/o ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Arpan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 288Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

506, 379, 365, 364(A) of the Indian Penal Code read with section 141 of the Railways Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, the FIR has been lodged against the petitioner and other 10-11 unknown accused persons against whom there is an allegation that they have kidnapped the passenger from the runnin...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Suresh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 745Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

Mr. Ajay Mukherjee, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The petitioners apprehends their arrest in connection with Katoriya P.S. Case No. 257 of 2020 registered under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504, 506, 3...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Devendra Ray v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 357Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case. 4. An allegation is of recovery of 46.5 litres of liquor from an Auto. It is next submitted that the petitioner is neither the owner nor the driver of the auto and he came to be implicated based on confes...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Md. Shamshad v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 375Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL REVISION No.141 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-0 Thana- District- Patna ====================================================== Md. Shamshad @ Samshad Alam Tajmul @ Md. Tajammul Vill- Kashibari,P.S-Jokihat, Distt.-Araria. ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) 4 SCC 225

1973 4 SCC 225Supreme Court of India

69% Match

FACTS: Challenged Kerala Land Reforms Act. 13-judge bench reviewed parliament's power to amend the Constitution. Held: Parliament can amend any part of the Constitution, including Fundamental Rights, but cannot alter or destroy the 'Basic Structure' of the Constitution. Ratio: Basic Structure doctri...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Shila Devi v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 250Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10910 of 2024 In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45166 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-308 Year-2021 Thana- PIRPAINTI District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== 1.Shila Devi W/O Arvind Yadav R/O Village-...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Vinod Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 160Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

the deceased with the petitioner on the date of occurrence. The dead body of the deceased has not been recovered. After completion of the investigation, on the basis of C.D.R., charge-sheet has been submitted against the petitioner under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code. Hence, the pet...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 3Next Page →