Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 456

Statute: Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC)

Devendra Ray v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 887Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case. 4. An allegation is of recovery of 46.5 litres of liquor from an Auto. It is next submitted that the petitioner is neither the owner nor the driver of the auto and he came to be implicated based on confes...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Ajmal Hussain v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 562Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

Sections 323, 354 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code. 4. Allegation against the petitioner is of matrimonial cruelty and of demand of dowry. 5. It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that petitioner Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5652 of 2024(6) dt.12-08-2024 2/3 happens to be husband of the compla...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Gajendra Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 693Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 404-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. 2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5021 of 2024(4) dt.04-07-2024 2/3 the offence punishable under sections 323 , 4...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Vikki Kumar Gupta v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 504Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

is apprehending his arrest in a case in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 26 of 2023 dated 23.08.2023 registered for the offence/s punishable u/s 376 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 4. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is alleged to have established physical relationship with th...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Jitendra Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 504Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur, in connection with Mahnar P.S. Case No.170 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 437(3) of the Code of Criminal Pr...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Raj Kumar Mahto v. The State Of Bihar Bihar

undefined INSC 178Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act lodged on 23.09.2023 by the informant, Usha Devi. 3. As per the prosecution story, the complainant alleged that Ritik Kumar and Subhash Jha came to her place and wanted her son, Muskan Kumar to accompany them. Upon enquiry, it was stated by them that this ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 564Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

available. It is apt and proper to refer the judgment rendered by this Court in the case of Parvati Devi @ Parvati Singh Vs. The State of Bihar and Ors., reported in 2024 (1) BLJ 178 held as follows: Patna High Court CWJC No.426 of 2022 dt.26-11-2024 6/8 “5. This Court would also refer ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

P.S.- Alamganj, District- Patna, presently posted as Dresser in R.S.B. O.T. No. 5, Patna Medical College and Hospital, Patna. 23.Chandan Kumar S/o Sudama Singh resident of Village- Karma, Post- Karma, Via- Nasriganj, P.S.- Karakat (Gorari), District- Rohtas, presently posted as Dresser in R.S.B. O....

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Manjit Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 657Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

petitioner by submitting that the bar of Section 76(2) of the Act applies in this case. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the nature of allegation against the petitioner, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period o...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sanjeev Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 455Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

of Sikandra P.S. Case no. 249 of 2022 registered under sections 307, 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 325, 34, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and one another are said to have struck Sintu Yadav with a tangi, seriously injuring h...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 4Next Page →