Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 437

Statute: Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC)

Mufasil, District- Begusarai, Presently residing at C/O Bhushan Jee, Sakuntala Kunj, Subhakarmana Colony, East Laxminagar, P.S. - Ramkrishna Nagar, Patna presently posted as Dresser in O.T. - 4, Patna Medical College Hospital, Patna. 7.Ajay Kumar Son of Suryabansh Singh presently residing at C/o, M...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Gajendra Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 528Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

1408, 14th Floor, D.B. Ozone Beside Thakur Mall, Near Dahisar Check Naka, Mira Road, P.S. - Kashimira, East Thane Mumbai (401107) 4.Gyan Ranjan Thakur @ Anshu Thakur Son Of Gajendra Thakur Resident Of Village - Rupolia, Panchkadi, P.S. - Dhaka, District - Motihari, At Present Flat No .- 1408, 14th ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) 4 SCC 225

1973 4 SCC 225Supreme Court of India

69% Match

FACTS: Challenged Kerala Land Reforms Act. 13-judge bench reviewed parliament's power to amend the Constitution. Held: Parliament can amend any part of the Constitution, including Fundamental Rights, but cannot alter or destroy the 'Basic Structure' of the Constitution. Ratio: Basic Structure doctri...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Kumar Pushpak v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 243Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioners are in custody in a case registered under Sections 419, 420, 467, 478, 471 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4141 of 2024(5) dt.08-10-2024 2/3 3. As per allegation in the FIR, pet...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Santosh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 233Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4060 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-358 Year-2023 Thana- GOPALPUR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Santosh Kumar S/O Bindeshwari Yadav R/O Village- Balatol, P.O- Nayatola, P.S- Puraini, ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Ramji Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 493Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.249 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-380 Year-2018 Thana- GHORASAHAN District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.Ramji Mahto Son Of Jai Mangal Mahto Resident Of Village - Mahdeva, P.S. - Ghorasa...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Vikash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 120Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4492 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-114 Year-2023 Thana- PARASBIGHA District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Vikash Kumar Son Of Sushil Kumar Resident of village- Bajitpur PS- Parasbigha Distric...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Pandit Namo Narayan Jha v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 527Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

today, be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned, Purnea in connection with Sadar (Muffasil) P.S Case No. 640 of 2023, subject to conditions as laid d...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Devendra Ray v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 472Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case. 4. An allegation is of recovery of 46.5 litres of liquor from an Auto. It is next submitted that the petitioner is neither the owner nor the driver of the auto and he came to be implicated based on confes...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Babloo Kumar v. The State Of Bihar Bihar

undefined INSC 432Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

despite the bar under Section 76 (2) of the Act, if on the basis of allegation made in the FIR, no offence under the said provision is made out. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner by submitting that the bar of Section 76(2) of t...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 3Next Page →