Cases Citing Section 3
Statute: Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC)
undefined INSC 758 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
registered under section 394 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. As per the prosecution case, three unknown accused persons are said to have looted Rs.13,000/ from the petrol pump on the point of firearm. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the F.I.R. was registered agai...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 273 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
and the injuries are lacerated wounds of size 5” X 0.25” and 3” X 0.25” over vertix of head length and frontal part of head length respectively, apart from chest pain and pain and tenderness over left leg. Learned counsel further submits that petitioner no. 1 & 2 are ladies and against petitioner ...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →1978 1 SCC 248 • Supreme Court of India
FACTS: Petitioner's passport was impounded without giving reasons. Held: Article 21 procedure must be 'just, fair, and reasonable', not arbitrary or oppressive. Ratio: Expanded Article 21 scope, introducing substantive due process principles into Indian jurisprudence....
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 597 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
of their arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui in connection with Crime Report No. - 88P/11....
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 451 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner by submitting that the bar of Section 76(2) of the Act applies in this case. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the material available on record, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his a...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 528 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
petitioner by submitting that the bar of Section 76(2) of the Act applies in this case. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the nature of allegation against the petitioner, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period o...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 549 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
submits that from bare perusal of the FIR it is clear that there is no allegation of firing against the petitioner rather this allegation is against co-accused Vishal Ranjan Singh. Petitioner’s name has come in this case during course of investigation on the basis of confessional statement of...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 172 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4 of 2023 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6909 of 2022 ====================================================== Chandradeo Mandal, Son of Dukhi Mandal, resident of Village- Khagor, P.S.- Kiul, District- Lakhisarai. ... ......
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 789 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6504 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-290 Year-2023 Thana- BAHERI District- Darbhanga ====================================================== 1.Santosh Kumar Sahu @ Santosh Sahu Son of Bilat Sahu @ Bilat Sah R/o vill - Barmattar, P...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 279 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
despite the bar under Section 76 (2) of the Act, if on the basis of allegation made in the FIR, no offence under the said provision is made out. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner by submitting that the bar of Section 76(2) of t...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →