Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 250

Statute: Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC)

Mukesh Kumar Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 185Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL REVISION No.148 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-0 Thana- District- Munger ====================================================== Mukesh Kumar Mandal @ Mukesh Mandal, Son of Raj Kumar Mandal, Resident of Village- Lal Darwaza, P.S.- Kotwali, ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Vikash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 475Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

Party/Informant and Mr. Binod Kumar, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Parasbigha P.S. Case No. 114 of 2023 registered under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. As per the allegation made ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Bharat Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 812Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11542 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-264 Year-2022 Thana- FOREST (GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL) District- Jamui ====================================================== 1.Bharat Yadav Son of Ganesh Yadav R/o vill - Baijala, P.S. - Jhajha,...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Kumar Pushpak v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 764Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

: (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 4141 of 2024) For the Petitioner/s: Mr. Nishant Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s: Mr. Harendra Prasad, APP (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 7123 of 2024) For the Petitioner/s: Mr. Prince Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s: Mr. Abhay Kumar, A...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Md. Afaque Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 376Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

(vishanpur), P.O. And P.S.- Pratappur, Distt.- Chatra (jharkhand). 5.Hasin Anwar @ Babablu S/O Said Anavar Ahmad @ Syed Anwar R/O Village- Bikopur, P.S- Kothi, Distt.- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1.The State Of Bihar 2.Ruby Parveen D/O Jahir Ahmad R/O Village- Belwar, P.S- Kothi, Distt.- Gaya...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Chhotu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 569Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner by submitting that the bar of Section 76(2) of the Act applies in this case. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the material available on record, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his a...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sumit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar Bihar

undefined INSC 374Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5553 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-150 Year-2022 Thana- HASANPUR District- Samastipur ====================================================== Sumit Kumar @ Sumit Kumar Yadav Son of Late Nand Kishor Yadav @ Nanhki Yadav R/o vill ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Jitendra Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 525Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

392 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. As per the prosecution, FIR has been lodged against four unknown accused persons against whom there is an allegation of committing robbery in the informant’s bank. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no of...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Vinod Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 710Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

the deceased with the petitioner on the date of occurrence. The dead body of the deceased has not been recovered. After completion of the investigation, on the basis of C.D.R., charge-sheet has been submitted against the petitioner under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code. Hence, the pet...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Ajmal Hussain v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 182Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

ORDER 612-08-2024Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. Despite valid service of notice, nobody appears on behalf of the Opposite Party No. 2. 3. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a complaint case registered for the offences punishable und...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 4Next Page →