Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 232

Statute: Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC)

Prabhu Dayal Singh v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 829Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

the Indian Penal Code and later on Section 304 of the Indian Penal Code was added. 3. Prosecution case, in short, is that accused persons including this petitioner armed with lathi, danda and pistol assaulted the informant. On hulla, all the accused persons fled away. ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

W/o Purushottam Das presently residing at - C/o Sitabji, Dariyapur, Mohar Tola, P.S.- Kadamkuan, District- Patna, presently posted as Dresser in Female O.T. (Gayni) Patna Medical College and Hospital, Patna High Court L.P.A No.3 of 2022(4) dt.16-01-2024 2/3 Patna. 13.Madhaw Murari Singh S/o Baban ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Suresh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 262Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

Mr. Ajay Mukherjee, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The petitioners apprehends their arrest in connection with Katoriya P.S. Case No. 257 of 2020 registered under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504, 506, 3...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Bharat Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 780Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

of their arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui in connection with Crime Report No. - 88P/11....

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Jagriti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 852Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7477 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-993 Year-2023 Thana- SHASTRINAGAR District- Patna ====================================================== Jagriti Kumari D/O Ramawadh Singh R/O East Laxmi Nagar, New By-Pass, N.H.-30, Khemni Ch...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Nisha Bharti v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 563Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2438 of 2024 ====================================================== Nisha Bharti Wife of Nagendra Sharma, resident of Village-Naya Tola, Bhalui, P.S.-Chanan, District-Lakhisarai. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1.The State of Bih...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Ramji Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 365Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.249 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-380 Year-2018 Thana- GHORASAHAN District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.Ramji Mahto Son Of Jai Mangal Mahto Resident Of Village - Mahdeva, P.S. - Ghorasa...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Prabhu Dayal Singh v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 895Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9415 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-422 Year-2023 Thana- RAJAON District- Banka ====================================================== Prabhu Dayal Singh @Prabhu Singh Son Of Late Siya Ram Singh Resident Of Village- Pattichak, ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Raushan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar Bihar

undefined INSC 516Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioners seek bail in connection with Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 292 of 2023 registered for the offence under Section 411, 413, 414 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. As per the prosecution case, the allegation against the petitioners is that stolen motorcycl...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) 4 SCC 225

1973 4 SCC 225Supreme Court of India

70% Match

FACTS: Challenged Kerala Land Reforms Act. 13-judge bench reviewed parliament's power to amend the Constitution. Held: Parliament can amend any part of the Constitution, including Fundamental Rights, but cannot alter or destroy the 'Basic Structure' of the Constitution. Ratio: Basic Structure doctri...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 2Next Page →