Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 156

Statute: Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC)

Md. Nakib Alam v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 139Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12499 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-29 Year-2017 Thana- SIMRI BAKHTIYARPUR District- Saharsa ====================================================== Md. Nakib Alam @ Nakib Ahmad @ Md. Nakib Ahmad Son Of Md. Rafi Ahmad @ Md. Rafi...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Mithlesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 102Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

No. 163 of 2023 registered for the offence under Sections 394/395/412 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 25 (1-b)A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, the allegation against four unknown miscreants is that they assaulted the informant and looted a cas...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

Mufasil, District- Begusarai, Presently residing at C/O Bhushan Jee, Sakuntala Kunj, Subhakarmana Colony, East Laxminagar, P.S. - Ramkrishna Nagar, Patna presently posted as Dresser in O.T. - 4, Patna Medical College Hospital, Patna. 7.Ajay Kumar Son of Suryabansh Singh presently residing at C/o, M...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sharwan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 339Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.13733 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-55 Year-2018 Thana- DUMARIYA District- Gaya ====================================================== Sharwan Yadav @ Ranjeet Yadav @ Bajaria Son of Jhari Yadav R/o vill - Orwan Tand, P.S. - Mai...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Vinod Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 215Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

the deceased with the petitioner on the date of occurrence. The dead body of the deceased has not been recovered. After completion of the investigation, on the basis of C.D.R., charge-sheet has been submitted against the petitioner under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code. Hence, the pet...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sahadev Yadav v. The State Of Bihar Bihar

undefined INSC 807Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12308 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-305 Year-2023 Thana- BHAGWANPUR District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== Sahadev Yadav @ Sahdev Yadav S/O Jatau Singh Yadav Ro Village- Londa, P.S- Lo...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sheikh Zulfakar v. The State Of Bihar Bihar

undefined INSC 728Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9602 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-76 Year-2023 Thana- GOPALPUR District- West Champaran ====================================================== SHEIKH ZULFAKAR S/O SHEIKH EMAMUL HAQUE R/O VILLAGE- KADMAWA, P.S- GOPALAPUR, DISTT...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Chhotu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 654Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner by submitting that the bar of Section 76(2) of the Act applies in this case. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the material available on record, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his a...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Babloo Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 296Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20103 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-284 Year-2022 Thana- ISLAMPUR District- Nalanda ====================================================== BABLOO PRASAD SON OF BINDESHWAR PRASAD RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- NARAYANPUR, PS- ISLAMPUR, DI...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Arpan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 261Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

506, 379, 365, 364(A) of the Indian Penal Code read with section 141 of the Railways Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, the FIR has been lodged against the petitioner and other 10-11 unknown accused persons against whom there is an allegation that they have kidnapped the passenger from the runnin...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 4Next Page →