Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 151

Statute: Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC)

Sumit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar Bihar

undefined INSC 266Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5553 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-150 Year-2022 Thana- HASANPUR District- Samastipur ====================================================== Sumit Kumar @ Sumit Kumar Yadav Son of Late Nand Kishor Yadav @ Nanhki Yadav R/o vill ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

Pramod Sah presently residing at C/o Bachchu Rajak, Mohalla- Mahendru, Near Malariya Office, P.S.- Sultanganj, District- Patna, presently posted as Dresser in the Department of Surgical I.C.U. Patna Medical College and Hospital, Patna. 12.Pushpa Rani W/o Purushottam Das presently residing at - C/o ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Mithlesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 463Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

No. 163 of 2023 registered for the offence under Sections 394/395/412 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 25 (1-b)A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, the allegation against four unknown miscreants is that they assaulted the informant and looted a cas...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Jitendra Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 474Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

392 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. As per the prosecution, FIR has been lodged against four unknown accused persons against whom there is an allegation of committing robbery in the informant’s bank. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no of...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Kumar Pushpak v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 868Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

: (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 4141 of 2024) For the Petitioner/s: Mr. Nishant Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s: Mr. Harendra Prasad, APP (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 7123 of 2024) For the Petitioner/s: Mr. Prince Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s: Mr. Abhay Kumar, A...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Manish Kumar Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 814Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

under sections 307, 379, 323, 324, 341, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code to which section 302 of the Indian Penal Code was added subsequently. 3. As per the prosecution case, the accused persons including the petitioner herein are said to have come variously armed with lathi, farsa etc. It is st...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Shahida Khatoon v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 322Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

of the petition. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. The petitioners have filed the instant application for grant of regular bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitio...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Bharat Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 106Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11542 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-264 Year-2022 Thana- FOREST (GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL) District- Jamui ====================================================== 1.Bharat Yadav Son of Ganesh Yadav R/o vill - Baijala, P.S. - Jhajha,...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Md. Shamshad v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 342Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL REVISION No.141 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-0 Thana- District- Patna ====================================================== Md. Shamshad @ Samshad Alam Tajmul @ Md. Tajammul Vill- Kashibari,P.S-Jokihat, Distt.-Araria. ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Ajmal Hussain v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 861Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

ORDER 612-08-2024Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. Despite valid service of notice, nobody appears on behalf of the Opposite Party No. 2. 3. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a complaint case registered for the offences punishable und...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 3Next Page →