Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 153A

Statute: Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (code-of-civil-procedure-1908)

Gajendra Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 894Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

1408, 14th Floor, D.B. Ozone Beside Thakur Mall, Near Dahisar Check Naka, Mira Road, P.S. - Kashimira, East Thane Mumbai (401107) 4.Gyan Ranjan Thakur @ Anshu Thakur Son Of Gajendra Thakur Resident Of Village - Rupolia, Panchkadi, P.S. - Dhaka, District - Motihari, At Present Flat No .- 1408, 14th ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL REVISION No.12 of 2021 ====================================================== Rang Vikalp registered office at Studio Variation Artists Studio Sardar Patel Colony, Patliputra Colony Telephone Exchange Road behind SIS Security Office, Kurj...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 589Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

deems it fit and proper to refer to a judgment rendered by the learned Division Bench of this Court in the case of Babita Kumari v. The State of Bihar and others, reported in 2016 SCC Online Pat 9434, paragraphs no. 7 and 8 whereof are reproduced herein below:- “7. Having considered t...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sheo Charan Dalmia v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 522Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.729 of 2024 ====================================================== 1.Sheo Charan Dalmia @ Sheocharan Bishwanath Dalmia Son of Late Vishwanath Dalmia @ Bishwanath Laxminaryan Dalmia, Resident of Mohalla Dalmia House Dhami Tola, ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Rahul Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 155Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1781 of 2024 ====================================================== Rahul Kumar Son of Mahesh Thakur Resident of Bhabhaul Chak Dihri Police Station Pipra Punpun District Patna at Present Resident of Village Gandhihat, Police Dt...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Manoj Kumar v. Mr. Amir Subhani, The Chief Secretary, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

undefined INSC 343Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.125 of 2024 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2484 of 2020 ====================================================== Manoj Kumar, Son of Late Jagdish Rai, Resident of Dharmi Raman Kutir, D.V.C. Road, Yarpur, P.S.- Gardanibagh,...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sheo Charan Dalmia v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 802Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

and the petitioners are allowed to approach the appropriate authority with fresh petition so that the matter could be taken to its logical conclusion. 6. Learned State counsel as also learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Gaya Municipal Corporation do not have any objection....

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 247Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.426 of 2022 ====================================================== Jyoti Kumari W/o Ajeet Kumar Aryan R/v- Paharpur, Ward No- 9, Gram Panchayat Alampur Kodaria, P.S.- Bibhutipur, Dist- Samastipur. ... ... ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sita Ram Singh v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 721Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.414 of 2022 ====================================================== 1.Sita Ram Singh, son of Late Mathura Singh, Resident of Village-Tarhari, Police Station-Halsi, District-Lakhisarai. 2.Priya Shankar Sah, son of Late Shree Kant...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 455Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

society. Any lapse in execution of the said scheme has to be taken very seriously. Closure of even one day entails the beneficiaries going without their meals, which cannot be overlooked. Thus, we do not find any infirmity in the decision of the authorities cancelling her selection as wel...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 3Next Page →