Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 147

Statute: Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (code-of-civil-procedure-1908)

Bharat Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 108Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11542 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-264 Year-2022 Thana- FOREST (GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL) District- Jamui ====================================================== 1.Bharat Yadav Son of Ganesh Yadav R/o vill - Baijala, P.S. - Jhajha,...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 236Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

128 of 2019 by the Collector, Samstipur whereby he allowed the appeal preferred by the respondent no. 8 and set aside the order dated 19.01.2019 passed by the District Programme Officer, Samastipur in Patna High Court CWJC No.426 of 2022 dt.26-11-2024 2/8 Aganwadi Case No. 178 of 2018 and upheld t...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Shahbaj Kuraishi Md. Sharif Quraishi v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 472Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5311 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-70 Year-2017 Thana- MEHSI District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.Shahbaj Kuraishi Md. Sharif Quraishi @ Sudhan Quraishi Village – Chaklahi P.S.- Mehs...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Harendra Prasad Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 156Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2247 of 2024 ====================================================== Harendra Prasad Yadav S/o Ramavatar Ray Resident of Village Chitariya tola Jasauli Patti Kotwa P.S. Kotwa district- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s Versu...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Munni Devi v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 733Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

and the injuries are lacerated wounds of size 5” X 0.25” and 3” X 0.25” over vertix of head length and frontal part of head length respectively, apart from chest pain and pain and tenderness over left leg. Learned counsel further submits that petitioner no. 1 & 2 are ladies and against petitioner ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sharda Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 142Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

ORAL ORDER 213-05-2024 Heard the parties. 2. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioners submit that he will be approaching the appropriate authority for the redressal of their grievance. 3. Granting the said liberty, the writ petition stands disposed of. Ravi/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 846Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

deems it fit and proper to refer to a judgment rendered by the learned Division Bench of this Court in the case of Babita Kumari v. The State of Bihar and others, reported in 2016 SCC Online Pat 9434, paragraphs no. 7 and 8 whereof are reproduced herein below:- “7. Having considered t...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Archana Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 304Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1412 of 2020 ====================================================== Archana Kumari Wife of Sri Pawan Kumar Singh, Resident of Village- Jagdishpur, P.O. and P.S.- Jagdishpur, District- West Champaran at Bettiah. ... ... Petiti...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Mukesh Kumar Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 164Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

the final order of maintenance under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C., passed in Maintenance Case No. 46 of 2016 by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court at Munger on 19 th November, 2018, whereby and Patna High Court CR. REV. No.148 of 2019 dt.24-04-2024 2/4 whereunder the learned Principal ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

08.10.2013 as well as for payment of 5% of total amount, which was to be paid at the juncture of approval of clay model submitted by the petitioner, as per clause 5(ii) of the Agreement. The said writ application was dismissed and the petitioner then filed LPA No. 494 of 2014, which was disposed of...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 4Next Page →