Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 115

Statute: Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (code-of-civil-procedure-1908)

Sheo Charan Dalmia v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 217Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.729 of 2024 ====================================================== 1.Sheo Charan Dalmia @ Sheocharan Bishwanath Dalmia Son of Late Vishwanath Dalmia @ Bishwanath Laxminaryan Dalmia, Resident of Mohalla Dalmia House Dhami Tola, ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 624Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

deems it fit and proper to refer to a judgment rendered by the learned Division Bench of this Court in the case of Babita Kumari v. The State of Bihar and others, reported in 2016 SCC Online Pat 9434, paragraphs no. 7 and 8 whereof are reproduced herein below:- “7. Having considered t...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) 4 SCC 225

1973 4 SCC 225Supreme Court of India

69% Match

FACTS: Challenged Kerala Land Reforms Act. 13-judge bench reviewed parliament's power to amend the Constitution. Held: Parliament can amend any part of the Constitution, including Fundamental Rights, but cannot alter or destroy the 'Basic Structure' of the Constitution. Ratio: Basic Structure doctri...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Md. Shahid v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 443Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.599 of 2024 ====================================================== Md. Shahid Son of Md. Minhajul Haque Resident of Mohallah- Alamganj, P.O.- Alamganj, P.S.- Alamganj, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1.The State ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sudha Devi v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 676Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.505 of 2020 ====================================================== 1.Sudha Devi W/o Manoj Kumar Das @ Manoj Das resident of Village - Purvi Kargahiya, P.S. - Bettiah Mufassil, District- West Champaran. 2.Manoj Kumar Das @ Manoj...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) 1 SCC 248

1978 1 SCC 248Supreme Court of India

69% Match

FACTS: Petitioner's passport was impounded without giving reasons. Held: Article 21 procedure must be 'just, fair, and reasonable', not arbitrary or oppressive. Ratio: Expanded Article 21 scope, introducing substantive due process principles into Indian jurisprudence....

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Shiv Prasad Raut v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 132Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.973 of 2017 ====================================================== 1.Shiv Prasad Raut and Ors Son of Late Fakan Raut, Resident of Village- Rupaulia, P.O.- Kumhrar, P.S.- Fenhara, District- East Champaran. 2.Chitranjan Rai, 3.S...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Mukesh Kumar Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 160Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

Munger ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s: Mr. Anurag Saurav, Adv. For the Respondent/s: Mr. Anand Kishore Choudhary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIBEK CHAUDHURI O...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Manoj Kumar v. Mr. Amir Subhani, The Chief Secretary, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

undefined INSC 519Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.125 of 2024 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2484 of 2020 ====================================================== Manoj Kumar, Son of Late Jagdish Rai, Resident of Dharmi Raman Kutir, D.V.C. Road, Yarpur, P.S.- Gardanibagh,...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

08.10.2013 as well as for payment of 5% of total amount, which was to be paid at the juncture of approval of clay model submitted by the petitioner, as per clause 5(ii) of the Agreement. The said writ application was dismissed and the petitioner then filed LPA No. 494 of 2014, which was disposed of...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 3Next Page →