Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 52

Statute: Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA)

Dipak Kumar Jha v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 146Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

Mr. Sajid Salim Khan, Advocate Mr. W.A. Khan, AC to SC-25 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 426-02-2024 Heard the parties. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the following reliefs: (i) for issuance...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Gajendra Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 637Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

1408, 14th Floor, D.B. Ozone Beside Thakur Mall, Near Dahisar Check Naka, Mira Road, P.S. - Kashimira, East Thane Mumbai (401107) 4.Gyan Ranjan Thakur @ Anshu Thakur Son Of Gajendra Thakur Resident Of Village - Rupolia, Panchkadi, P.S. - Dhaka, District - Motihari, At Present Flat No .- 1408, 14th ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Vikki Kumar Gupta v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 157Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

is apprehending his arrest in a case in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 26 of 2023 dated 23.08.2023 registered for the offence/s punishable u/s 376 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 4. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is alleged to have established physical relationship with th...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Suresh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 225Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

Mr. Ajay Mukherjee, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The petitioners apprehends their arrest in connection with Katoriya P.S. Case No. 257 of 2020 registered under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504, 506, 3...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Gajendra Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 881Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5021 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-5645 Year-2022 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE District- Patna ====================================================== 1.Gajendra Thakur Son Of Late Devnath Thakur Resident Of Village - Rupolia, Pa...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Virendra Mukhiya v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 141Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

17.520 liters of Nepali Saufi wine has been recovered from the house of petitioner. 4. It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that alleged recovery has been effected from the house, which is in joint possession of the family members. Petitioner lives out of Bihar for his livelihood and he has got ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Santosh Kumar Sahu v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 560Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

are only scratch marks over front and sides of the neck, which falsifies the prosecution story about the informant being assaulted by the petitioners. The petitioners have got no criminal history. 05. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. 06. Having regard to the fa...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Prabhu Dayal Singh v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 774Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

the Indian Penal Code and later on Section 304 of the Indian Penal Code was added. 3. Prosecution case, in short, is that accused persons including this petitioner armed with lathi, danda and pistol assaulted the informant. On hulla, all the accused persons fled away. ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Harsh Bhushan Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 443Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4784 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-612 Year-2023 Thana- BUXAR District- Buxar ====================================================== Harsh Bhushan Thakur Son of Chandra Bhushan Thakur R/o vill - Tarkanala Main Road Buxar, P.S....

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Kaushal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 425Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

68% Match

by which the petitioner has been dismissed from the service and further to reinstate him in service with all consequential benefits. 3.Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the final Patna High Court CWJC No.2681 of 2019 dt.12-02-2024 2/3 order of punishment has been passed by the order ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 4Next Page →