Cases Citing Section 41
Statute: Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA)
undefined INSC 368 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
appointment letter and in his place, the respondent no. 8 was selected as Aganwadi Sevika. 4. On the other hand, the respondent no. 8 obtained only 58.60 % marks, much less than the petitioner, who obtained 76% marks, nonetheless her case was placed for consideration and, as such,...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 318 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
society. Any lapse in execution of the said scheme has to be taken very seriously. Closure of even one day entails the beneficiaries going without their meals, which cannot be overlooked. Thus, we do not find any infirmity in the decision of the authorities cancelling her selection as wel...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 335 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
but a ‘superstructure’ erected/installed on the platform of 30 ft height and the statue encompasses the word ‘superstructure’ mentioned in Section 2(k) of the Act 2008. The learned counsel next Patna High Court C.R. No.12 of 2021(11) dt.12-01-2024 5/10 submitted that, as per Clause 5(ii) of the Ag...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 150 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5021 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-5645 Year-2022 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE District- Patna ====================================================== 1.Gajendra Thakur Son Of Late Devnath Thakur Resident Of Village - Rupolia, Pa...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 798 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
P.N. Shahi, Sr. Advocate Mr.Avinash Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s: Mr. Abbas Haider, SC-6 Mr. Wasi Mohammad, AC to SC-6 For the Corporation : Mr. Rabindra Kumar Priyadarshi, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 832 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
the letter sent by him is still with the Managing Director, Bihar State Tourism Development Corporation, who is Arbitrator, as per paragraph- 22 of the Agreement, which is extracted hereinbelow:- “22. In case of any difference of opinion in any item of work the issue will be resolved by the Man...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 212 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
report, case diary, seizure list as well as impugned order dated 06.12.2023 and 08.01.2024, it appears that FIR registered against eight named accused persons including the petitioners and other unknown persons on the basis of written report of Police Sub Inspector, Alok Kumar and both the petition...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 458 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
Biharsharif, Nalanda, where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Excise P.S. Case No. 766 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. aditi/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 362 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.426 of 2022 ====================================================== Jyoti Kumari W/o Ajeet Kumar Aryan R/v- Paharpur, Ward No- 9, Gram Panchayat Alampur Kodaria, P.S.- Bibhutipur, Dist- Samastipur. ... ... ...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 139 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
is apprehending his arrest in a case in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 26 of 2023 dated 23.08.2023 registered for the offence/s punishable u/s 376 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 4. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is alleged to have established physical relationship with th...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →