Cases Citing Section 18
Statute: Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA)
undefined INSC 649 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
society. Any lapse in execution of the said scheme has to be taken very seriously. Closure of even one day entails the beneficiaries going without their meals, which cannot be overlooked. Thus, we do not find any infirmity in the decision of the authorities cancelling her selection as wel...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 318 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
marriage of the petitioner was solemnised on 29.11.2017 itself, is the contention of learned Advocate for the petitioner. The order of the Collector, Samastipur is under challenge in the case in hand. 6. Learned Advocate for the petitioner contended that the certificate issued by the prie...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 532 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
appointment letter and in his place, the respondent no. 8 was selected as Aganwadi Sevika. 4. On the other hand, the respondent no. 8 obtained only 58.60 % marks, much less than the petitioner, who obtained 76% marks, nonetheless her case was placed for consideration and, as such,...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 800 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent/s: Mr. Rishi Raj Sinha, SC-19 : Mr. Saurabh Kumar, AC to SC-13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 217-10-2024 In the present petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- 2....
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 260 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
deems it fit and proper to refer to a judgment rendered by the learned Division Bench of this Court in the case of Babita Kumari v. The State of Bihar and others, reported in 2016 SCC Online Pat 9434, paragraphs no. 7 and 8 whereof are reproduced herein below:- “7. Having considered t...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →2013 2 SCC 1 • Supreme Court of India
FACTS: Petition seeking action for police failure to register an FIR for kidnapping. Held: Registration of FIR is mandatory under Section 154 CrPC (now Section 173 BNSS) if the information discloses a cognizable offence. Ratio: No preliminary inquiry is permitted if cognizable offence is disclosed; ...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 635 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
by which the petitioner has been dismissed from the service and further to reinstate him in service with all consequential benefits. 3.Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the final Patna High Court CWJC No.2681 of 2019 dt.12-02-2024 2/3 order of punishment has been passed by the order ...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 672 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
petitioner. Therefore, the same has to held as bad, illegal, contrary to the provisions of Rule 27(ii) of the Control Order and has to necessarily set aside. 9. Having regard to the above facts and circumstances and the law laid down by this Hon’ble...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 435 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
P.N. Shahi, Sr. Advocate Mr.Avinash Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s: Mr. Abbas Haider, SC-6 Mr. Wasi Mohammad, AC to SC-6 For the Corporation : Mr. Rabindra Kumar Priyadarshi, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 690 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
of the Act 2008. Therefore, the Arbitration Tribunal has jurisdiction over the dispute. 9. So far as the submission of the learned Senior Counsel is concerned, the word ‘superstructure’ has no where Patna High Court C.R. No.12 of 2021(11) dt.12-01-2024 8/10 been defined in the Act 2008. ...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →