Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 168

Statute: Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA)

Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar (2014) 8 SCC 273

2014 8 SCC 273Supreme Court of India

70% Match

FACTS: Anticipatory bail application in a Section 498A IPC cruelty case. Held: Arrest should not be the default action in offences carrying punishment of less than 7 years. Ratio: Police must comply with Section 41A CrPC (now Section 35 BNSS) notice guidelines before executing arrest....

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Santosh Kumar Sahu v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 338Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6504 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-290 Year-2023 Thana- BAHERI District- Darbhanga ====================================================== 1.Santosh Kumar Sahu @ Santosh Sahu Son of Bilat Sahu @ Bilat Sah R/o vill - Barmattar, P...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Kaushal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 424Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

by which the petitioner has been dismissed from the service and further to reinstate him in service with all consequential benefits. 3.Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the final Patna High Court CWJC No.2681 of 2019 dt.12-02-2024 2/3 order of punishment has been passed by the order ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

a sand stone statue of Lord Budha having 70 ft height in Bhumi Sparsh posture, on the platform of a height of 30 ft. The learned counsel submitted that as per the Agreement, 30 ft high platform was to be constructed first and thereon the statue of Lord Budha was to be installed. As such, ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Manjit Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 442Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner has been made accused Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3761 of 2024(2) dt.12-02-2024 2/3 in this case only because of the co...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) 1 SCC 248

1978 1 SCC 248Supreme Court of India

70% Match

FACTS: Petitioner's passport was impounded without giving reasons. Held: Article 21 procedure must be 'just, fair, and reasonable', not arbitrary or oppressive. Ratio: Expanded Article 21 scope, introducing substantive due process principles into Indian jurisprudence....

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Nisha Bharti v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 252Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2438 of 2024 ====================================================== Nisha Bharti Wife of Nagendra Sharma, resident of Village-Naya Tola, Bhalui, P.S.-Chanan, District-Lakhisarai. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1.The State of Bih...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Bharat Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 360Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11542 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-264 Year-2022 Thana- FOREST (GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL) District- Jamui ====================================================== 1.Bharat Yadav Son of Ganesh Yadav R/o vill - Baijala, P.S. - Jhajha,...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sahabuddin Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 879Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

petitioner fairly submitted that the grievance can be taken up before the respondent nos. 9 to 11 which he shall be doing in next four weeks. 4. Needless to say, if such representation is filed, the respondents are duty bound to look into the matter and take a decision in next six months. Patna Hi...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Devendra Ray v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 783Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case. 4. An allegation is of recovery of 46.5 litres of liquor from an Auto. It is next submitted that the petitioner is neither the owner nor the driver of the auto and he came to be implicated based on confes...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 2Next Page →