Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 10

Statute: Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA)

the Bihar State Tourism Development Corporation (Annexure-5). Thereafter, an agreement was entered into between the parties on 29 th August, 2013. The consideration money was fixed as Rs.17.37 crores, Patna High Court C.R. No.12 of 2021(11) dt.12-01-2024 3/10 as per Clause 5 of the agreement. The ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sheo Charan Dalmia v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 571Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

and the petitioners are allowed to approach the appropriate authority with fresh petition so that the matter could be taken to its logical conclusion. 6. Learned State counsel as also learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Gaya Municipal Corporation do not have any objection....

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sanjay Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 639Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

as also the petitioners having no criminal antecedent, let the petitioners, abovenamed, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Riga P.S. Case No. ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Suresh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 760Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

on anticipatory bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Chief J...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sailen Sah v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 539Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

case. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted that petitioner has got no concern with the recovered arms and Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6320 of 2024(4) dt.08-05-2024 2/3 ammunitions. Learned counsel further s...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Santosh Kumar Sahu v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 309Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6504 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-290 Year-2023 Thana- BAHERI District- Darbhanga ====================================================== 1.Santosh Kumar Sahu @ Santosh Sahu Son of Bilat Sahu @ Bilat Sah R/o vill - Barmattar, P...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Jagdeo Das v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 174Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

stated or given in the complaint case. It is further submitted that the present case has been lodged by the complainant is after thought and contrived so on 24.09.2020 just to create a defense for her husband and her family members, who have cheated the petitioner in the name of job...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sailen Sah v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 617Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

instituted for the offences under Sections 25(1-b)a, 26 of the Arms Act. 3. As per the F.I.R., one country-made pistol, eight live cartridges and one dagger has been recovered from this petitioner. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in th...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Suresh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 346Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

Mr. Ajay Mukherjee, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The petitioners apprehends their arrest in connection with Katoriya P.S. Case No. 257 of 2020 registered under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504, 506, 3...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Raushan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar Bihar

undefined INSC 392Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

69% Match

petitioners. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the petitioners are innocent and they have falsely been implicated in this case. 5. It is also submitted by the learned counsel for the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9593 of 2024(2) dt.20-02-2024 2/2 petitioners that the petitioner ar...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 4Next Page →