Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 528

Statute: Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS)

of the Act 2008. Therefore, the Arbitration Tribunal has jurisdiction over the dispute. 9. So far as the submission of the learned Senior Counsel is concerned, the word ‘superstructure’ has no where Patna High Court C.R. No.12 of 2021(11) dt.12-01-2024 8/10 been defined in the Act 2008. ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Arvind Kumar v. Bihar State Power (holding) Co. Ltd

undefined INSC 888Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 1218 of 2020 ====================================================== Arvind Kumar, Son of Sri Ram Prit Ram, presently residing at White House, House No. 03, Kailashpuri, Hanuman Nagar, P.S. Kankarbagh, Patna 800020. ... ... P...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

but a ‘superstructure’ erected/installed on the platform of 30 ft height and the statue encompasses the word ‘superstructure’ mentioned in Section 2(k) of the Act 2008. The learned counsel next Patna High Court C.R. No.12 of 2021(11) dt.12-01-2024 5/10 submitted that, as per Clause 5(ii) of the Ag...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

08.10.2013 as well as for payment of 5% of total amount, which was to be paid at the juncture of approval of clay model submitted by the petitioner, as per clause 5(ii) of the Agreement. The said writ application was dismissed and the petitioner then filed LPA No. 494 of 2014, which was disposed of...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Prabhu Dayal Singh v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 191Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

the Indian Penal Code and later on Section 304 of the Indian Penal Code was added. 3. Prosecution case, in short, is that accused persons including this petitioner armed with lathi, danda and pistol assaulted the informant. On hulla, all the accused persons fled away. ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Manish Kumar Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 721Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

under sections 307, 379, 323, 324, 341, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code to which section 302 of the Indian Penal Code was added subsequently. 3. As per the prosecution case, the accused persons including the petitioner herein are said to have come variously armed with lathi, farsa etc. It is st...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Md. Afaque Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 208Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11360 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-92 Year-2023 Thana- KOTHI District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.Md. Afaque Ansari @ Afak Ansari @ Bechan Miyan @ Md. Afak Ansari S/O Rafique Ansari R/O Villa...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

the letter sent by him is still with the Managing Director, Bihar State Tourism Development Corporation, who is Arbitrator, as per paragraph- 22 of the Agreement, which is extracted hereinbelow:- “22. In case of any difference of opinion in any item of work the issue will be resolved by the Man...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Sharda Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 287Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

ORAL ORDER 213-05-2024 Heard the parties. 2. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioners submit that he will be approaching the appropriate authority for the redressal of their grievance. 3. Granting the said liberty, the writ petition stands disposed of. Ravi/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Archana Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 463Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

authorities shall take action against the petitioner in accordance with law. 6.A counter affidavit is filed on behalf of the State in which he has stated that any degree of Tribhuwan University, Nepal has been declared ‘not valid’ for appointment of regular/Niyojit teachers. All niyojan units were ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 5Next Page →