Cases Citing Section 483
Statute: Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS)
undefined INSC 249 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner by submitting that the bar of Section 76(2) of the Act applies in this case. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the material available on record, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his a...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 578 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
appointment letter and in his place, the respondent no. 8 was selected as Aganwadi Sevika. 4. On the other hand, the respondent no. 8 obtained only 58.60 % marks, much less than the petitioner, who obtained 76% marks, nonetheless her case was placed for consideration and, as such,...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 168 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
based on the fact that he is owner of the Truck. It is next submitted that petitioner is a businessman and no prudent businessman would use his own vehicle for committing an occurrence and thus would Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7339 of 2024(2) dt.22-02-2024 2/2 create evidence against hims...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 506 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
Bindu Bhushan, Chief Engineer, Muzaffarpur Zone, Public Health Engineering Department, Muzaffarpur. 6.Sri Manoj Kumar, Superintending Engineer, Public Health Engineering Darbhanga Circle, Darbhanga. 7.Sri Subodh Sankar, Executive Engineer, Public Health Division, Madhubani. 8.Sri Dharmendra Kumar, ...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 333 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
Ram Narayan Mahto, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s: Mr. Anant Kumar 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 220-02-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 02. In the...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 113 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The recovery was made Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5203 of 2024(2) dt.15-02-2024 2/3 from the co-accused, petitioner has no c...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 600 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner has been made accused Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3761 of 2024(2) dt.12-02-2024 2/3 in this case only because of the co...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 166 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 02-02-2024 The matter has been taken up on mentioning being made on behalf of the petitioner. 2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 23.11.2023 passed by learned Subordinate Judge-I, ...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 210 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
are only scratch marks over front and sides of the neck, which falsifies the prosecution story about the informant being assaulted by the petitioners. The petitioners have got no criminal history. 05. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. 06. Having regard to the fa...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →undefined INSC 123 • Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL REVISION No.12 of 2021 ====================================================== Rang Vikalp registered office at Studio Variation Artists Studio Sardar Patel Colony, Patliputra Colony Telephone Exchange Road behind SIS Security Office, Kurj...
Read Full Judgment Analysis →