Skip to main content
Citation Index • Supreme Court

Cases Citing Section 482

Statute: Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS)

Md. Afaque Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 610Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11360 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-92 Year-2023 Thana- KOTHI District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.Md. Afaque Ansari @ Afak Ansari @ Bechan Miyan @ Md. Afak Ansari S/O Rafique Ansari R/O Villa...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 224Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

the Bidhyapati Mandir, Samastipur, where the marriage was solemnised categorically demonstrates that the marriage of the petitioner with Ajeet Kumar Aryan was solemnised before the cut off date and as Patna High Court CWJC No.426 of 2022 dt.26-11-2024 4/8 such non-selection of the petitioner by tr...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →

which was to be based on a platform of 30 ft height. As such, the work performed by the petitioner in pursuance of the contract comes under the definition of ‘work contract’ defined in Section 2(k) of the Act 2008. Therefore, the Arbitration Tribunal has jurisdiction over the disput...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
The Union Of India v. Lalan Kumar

undefined INSC 370Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.789 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.22349 of 2012 ====================================================== 1.The Union Of India through Secretary Cum D.G., department of Post, Bhawan, New Delhi. 2.The Assistant Dire...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Yogendra Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 175Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

Bindu Bhushan, Chief Engineer, Muzaffarpur Zone, Public Health Engineering Department, Muzaffarpur. 6.Sri Manoj Kumar, Superintending Engineer, Public Health Engineering Darbhanga Circle, Darbhanga. 7.Sri Subodh Sankar, Executive Engineer, Public Health Division, Madhubani. 8.Sri Dharmendra Kumar, ...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Krishnadeo Poddar v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 289Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.10 of 2020 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12370 of 2015 ====================================================== Krishnadeo Poddar Son of Late Sitabi Poddar, Retired Head Electrician, Muzaffapur Electric Supply Circle, res...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Shila Devi v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 337Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10910 of 2024 In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45166 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-308 Year-2021 Thana- PIRPAINTI District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== 1.Shila Devi W/O Arvind Yadav R/O Village-...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Santosh Kumar Sahu v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 783Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

are only scratch marks over front and sides of the neck, which falsifies the prosecution story about the informant being assaulted by the petitioners. The petitioners have got no criminal history. 05. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. 06. Having regard to the fa...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Nunmani Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 368Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

of Atrocities) Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, the co-accused person, Gulshan is alleged to have tried to commit rape on the informant's daughter. Even after making complaint against the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3882 of 2024(3) dt.10-05-2024 2/3 co-accused Gulshan Kumar @ Anand Y...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
Jyoti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

undefined INSC 623Patnahcucisdb94 High Court (10 8)

70% Match

appointment letter and in his place, the respondent no. 8 was selected as Aganwadi Sevika. 4. On the other hand, the respondent no. 8 obtained only 58.60 % marks, much less than the petitioner, who obtained 76% marks, nonetheless her case was placed for consideration and, as such,...

Read Full Judgment Analysis →
← Previous PagePage 5Next Page →